Printable View
A pal is starting this cycle tomorrow 250sus/200deca ×2 pw for 12 weeks. When chatting about it we both heard that the norm is to make the last 1 or 2 jabs test only, but I also recall someone saying to start with test only for first jab... something to do with receptors... can you guys clarify if any or both of these are true!
Stats!
I'm guessing he's 5'10 approx 13 and half stone.... 32yr. He's cycled before.... it was just bits we'd heard and wondered wether true or not!
If you read up on the compounds you will get your answer quite fast actually i know this is not what you want to hear but ppl who are going to use aas and not even know how to run them it's not smart mate is it that's your health you playing with
I'm running test only cycle! It was a discussion my friend and I were having... and I thought I'd help him out by querying what we'd discussed....Quote:
Originally Posted by clarky.
A simple reply would of been more informative but I guess that would be too much to ask.
I've asked questions before and not fully understood, then had sarcastic replys off 'vets' for reiterating.
I know the Q was for your friendQuote:
Originally Posted by chester101
This isnt necessarily aimed at you bud but seems like a clicky site! Some of the 'vets' are cast in stone, yet preach from a different bible every couple of years.... yet you question their beliefs and you are the anti-christ!
Some of these guys are great ie capebuffalo, back in black, and crazy mike... to name a few....
I've tried to push a few guys to join this site but tbh..... I wish I hadnt.
I fixed that for you chesterQuote:
Originally Posted by chester101
keep in mind that AAS is still ever evolving and we know much more today than we knew 5 years ago.Quote:
Originally Posted by chester101
To answer your question. NO. There is NO reason to start Test early but with Deca it is highly recommended to run test out 2 weeks past the Deca. For example: Test 1-14/Deca 1-12
Many many thanks lunk! Faith restored!
There you go chester your a happy chappy again :7up:Quote:
Originally Posted by chester101
Cheers clarky, lunk and back in black!Quote:
Originally Posted by Back In Black
One thing that did make me laugh was I was told I needed to eat more due to my height/weight ratio... which may I add I took on board (after a little grump) yet a guy who's stats were 2" taller and 4lb heavier was 'in the zone' for aas.... by the same guy (none of you).... strange! :)
At the end of the day it's your decision. 90+% of the guys that come here (including myself) are NOT actually in the type of shape where steroids are REQUIRED to see results.Quote:
Originally Posted by chester101
yes I agree here with LUnkQuote:
Originally Posted by Lunk1
Wow! You hammered Mike. Is that in regards to CM?Quote:
Originally Posted by Back In Black
I didn't realize Mike is now banned. I guess I've answered my own question.
Crazy mike got banned??
That's what it says.
He was involved with chemical muscle.And pushing there products on members is my understanding.
I heard he'd disagreed with austinite?? ;)
I'm sure Austinite will chime in on your comment and fill you in.Quote:
Originally Posted by chester101
She'll take it light hearted I'm certain ;)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wizwell
Yep:)Quote:
Originally Posted by Wizwell
You have a PM sir.
I didn't mean he was gonna rip into you I literally meant he would fill you in.Quote:
Originally Posted by chester101
Austinite is a guy by the way lol
Really a guy? Pics of a woman..... and moody lol.... ha ha I'll take my chances! :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Mp859
Why would you make such comments and make up a theory, saying Mike was banned because he disagreed with me? Who told you this anyway?Quote:
Originally Posted by chester101
wrong place. edit