Results 1 to 9 of 9
Thread: primo or mas with test?
-
11-24-2013, 05:53 PM #1
primo or mas with test?
hey guys, im looking to put on some lean mass by keeping a solid diet and of course the use of my seccond anabolic steroids cycle which i wont be starting until march of next year so i have time to lean out naturally. im at 14% body fat, i weigh 160lbs and am 5'7.....i wanna get to about 165 to 170 but have 10% bf
I have read alot about mas and primo, and i know primo is very expensive. Is Mas going to give me the same results as primo or is mas more just a temporary harder?
Please let me know if i should stack primo or mas along with dosage with my test cycle
weeks ,,,,,,anabolic steroids ..................dosage
1-12........ testosterone enanthate ........... ....600mg/week
5-12 ........anavar .............60 to 80mg/day
1-12 ........primobolan... ..600mg/week OR masteron ....400mg/week
I will post something later once the cycle is finalized to figure out PCT as i have lots of time.
-
11-24-2013, 06:05 PM #2
Both are temporary with respect to the finishing "Look". These two compounds are very unique with the final appearance and while you can retain the gains and body fat, the unique marberlized look from masteron or the tightness and definition of primo will diminish quickly.
~ PLEASE DO NOT ASK FOR SOURCE CHECKS ~
"It's human nature in a 'more is better' society full of a younger generation that expects instant gratification, then complain when they don't get it. The problem will get far worse before it gets better". ~ kelkel
-
11-24-2013, 06:43 PM #3
-
11-24-2013, 06:46 PM #4
The compound has nothing to do with keeping lean gains.
Why would you think only primo? Does the muscle generated from Masteron somehow evaporate?~ PLEASE DO NOT ASK FOR SOURCE CHECKS ~
"It's human nature in a 'more is better' society full of a younger generation that expects instant gratification, then complain when they don't get it. The problem will get far worse before it gets better". ~ kelkel
-
11-24-2013, 06:51 PM #5
no i was under the impression masteron is more of an asthetic look, and you would keep less of the gains not evaporate, you know like when u go off AAS you always loose a bit or your gains
-
11-24-2013, 06:54 PM #6
I like the finished look of both. But if I had to choose, I'd go with Primo.
Again, the compound has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with muscle retention. Muscle fibers generated with the aid of one compound are no different than fibers generated with the aid any other compound.~ PLEASE DO NOT ASK FOR SOURCE CHECKS ~
"It's human nature in a 'more is better' society full of a younger generation that expects instant gratification, then complain when they don't get it. The problem will get far worse before it gets better". ~ kelkel
-
11-24-2013, 08:03 PM #7
I've used both. Primo is great if you can get it. It's also easier on the prostate than masteron but, I've preferred masteron lately. I find better results with less gear on mast vs. primo.
-
11-24-2013, 09:45 PM #8
On your 2nd cycle you don't need to be stacking.Test will get you there.Heck its only your 2nd cycle and you are a walking Pharm.Wat will it look like 6 or 7 cycles from now.Rely on your diet more and aas less and you will be better off in the long run.
-
11-24-2013, 09:48 PM #9
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
cutting/ fat loss advice needed...
04-16-2024, 01:34 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS