Results 1 to 5 of 5
Thread: Basic AAS Math
-
02-12-2014, 05:24 AM #1Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2013
- Location
- The Gym
- Posts
- 215
Basic AAS Math
For awhile i had the thought that what you were pinning weekly mattered, you always hear guys saying oh im pinning 1000mg a week or im pinning 1200mg a week. Ive been struggling to grasp why I seemed to have much better gains on my last Test Enan cycle than my current Test Prop cycle, then I began to think about it. Even though my weekly mg is about the same. Pinning 2mL of 250mg Enan, would mean that my body is holding level at about 500mg of test, pinning 3mL of Test Prop 100, my body is only holding about 300mg of test constantly. Is this the correct way to think about it, instead of looking at weekly mg intake? if so that would explain why my enan cycle gave me better results.
-
02-12-2014, 07:18 AM #2
What?
~ PLEASE DO NOT ASK FOR SOURCE CHECKS ~
"It's human nature in a 'more is better' society full of a younger generation that expects instant gratification, then complain when they don't get it. The problem will get far worse before it gets better". ~ kelkel
-
02-12-2014, 07:34 AM #3
-
02-12-2014, 07:41 AM #4
I don't understand your math. But your first cycle usually gives the best results. You may have under dosed prop. You may not be eating training or resting as well as you were on the e cycle. Did you have blood work done after? If so were your levels back in a normal range? What ai are you using? There are too many variables to say why one yielded better than another.
-
02-12-2014, 11:21 AM #5
So, first cycle was test C at 500mg per week, and second cycle was test P at 300mg per week?
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Expired dbol (blue hearts)
01-11-2025, 04:00 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS