Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    ElGringo is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    74

    400mg Test E vs 500mg /week

    anybody has any input on this?

    i know the more test, the more gains. but is it worth the shutdown for 400mg/week for a 10 week cycle?

  2. #2
    marcus300's Avatar
    marcus300 is offline ~Retired~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    ENGLAND
    Posts
    40,922
    ...............................................

  3. #3
    marcus300's Avatar
    marcus300 is offline ~Retired~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    ENGLAND
    Posts
    40,922
    400/500mgs per week is a good basic cycle dose but not at your age nothing is worth shutting down your natural test yet. its still developing

  4. #4
    Times Roman's Avatar
    Times Roman is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Back from Afghanistan
    Posts
    27,383
    ^agreed. 22 is still a bit on the young side.

  5. #5
    ElGringo is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    74
    basically my question is: will the 100mg/week make a big difference?

    i ask this because it occurred to me that the dose may be directly related to your body mass index. for example take 2 almost identical individual except for the BMI. subject1 is 180 lbs and subject2 is 210 lbs. both will be running their first cycle. if subject1 was to take 400mg/week and make a 20lbs gain, would subject2 need 500mg/week to expect the same result?

    so basically question #2 would be: is the weekly dose or the overall dose for any cycle (lets assume it's cycle #1 so receptors are virgin) directly related to the persons body mass?

  6. #6
    ElGringo is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    74
    Quote Originally Posted by ElGringo View Post
    basically my question is: will the 100mg/week make a big difference?

    i ask this because it occurred to me that the dose may be directly related to your body mass index. for example take 2 almost identical individual except for the BMI. subject1 is 180 lbs and subject2 is 210 lbs. both will be running their first cycle. if subject1 was to take 400mg/week and make a 20lbs gain, would subject2 need 500mg/week to expect the same result?

    so basically question #2 would be: is the weekly dose or the overall dose for any cycle (lets assume it's cycle #1 so receptors are virgin) directly related to the persons body mass?
    no input on this?

    Quote Originally Posted by Times Roman View Post
    ^agreed. 22 is still a bit on the young side.
    turning 23 in a couple months

    Quote Originally Posted by marcus300 View Post
    400/500mgs per week is a good basic cycle dose but not at your age nothing is worth shutting down your natural test yet. its still developing
    my natural test levels are low anyway

  7. #7
    marcus300's Avatar
    marcus300 is offline ~Retired~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    ENGLAND
    Posts
    40,922
    Quote Originally Posted by ElGringo View Post
    no input on this?



    turning 23 in a couple months



    my natural test levels are low anyway

    Go and see your doctor for blood work if you suspect you have low test. If you cycle you will definitely destroy your natural test if your on the low side already. It's all in your diet and training at your age but guess I'm wasting my time replying anyway.

  8. #8
    ElGringo is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    74
    Quote Originally Posted by marcus300 View Post
    Go and see your doctor for blood work if you suspect you have low test. If you cycle you will definitely destroy your natural test if your on the low side already. It's all in your diet and training at your age but guess I'm wasting my time replying anyway.
    i made a thread on the HRT section on this. guessed it was the right place to post.

    anyway, taken from said post:
    DD/MM/YYYY as it should be

    06/05/2011 (19 years old)
    L.H. 1,12 mUI/ml reference values 0 - 20mUI/ml
    Estradiol 33,8 pg/ml
    Free testosterone 8,7 pg/ml reference values ND - 44 pg/ml
    Prolactin 14,1 ng/ml reference values 2,5 - 17 ng/ml


    19/05/2011 (~2 weeks later)
    L.H. 7,02 mUI/ml
    Estradiol 25,9 pg/ml
    Free test 9,10 pg/ml
    F.S.H. 1,59 mUI/ml reference values 0 - 20 mUI/ml


    14/05/2013 (21 years old)
    L.H. 3,66 mUI/ml
    Estradiol 24,9 pg/ml
    Free test 10,9 pg/ml new reference values: 20-39yo 8,8 - 27 pg/ml
    F.S.H 5,99 mUI/ml

    will update soon with 2014 test results

    i first tested my T levels because i have pubertal gyno and was on the road to getting surgery done when the doc asked for hormone tests. results came back and clearly my T leves were low. didn't get surgery done because of this and went to an endocrinologist. the doc said my T levels were low but not enough for therapy. she suggested (and this is a quote) to start lifting weights and to try to have as much sex as possible. this was in 2011. as you can see from my 2013 tests, i didn't improve much


    i know there's still room to improve my diet and i'm working on it, but my test levels definitely don't help much.

    is there any possibility you answer my two questions posted above? i'm genuinely interested in this as general AAS knowledge.
    i appreciate your answers man, don't be so negative. if i didn't take your opinion or anybody's in this forum seriously, i'd be doing whatever the fawk i wanted to do long ago.

    thanks

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •