Results 1 to 8 of 8
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Buster Brown

Thread: NPP and Deca

  1. #1
    adrenaline99's Avatar
    adrenaline99 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    199

    NPP and Deca

    Everyone seems to be using NPP over deca nowadays. I don't understand what the advantages are, its the same hormone just faster acting which means more pinning which sucks. I hear often that NPP causes less bloat, how exactly does that work if it's the exact same hormone? I love deca but trying to decide if it's worth it to try NPP which is double the price.

  2. #2
    pasha is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    everywhere/anywhere
    Posts
    208
    like test E causes more water retention than test P. same idea with deca and NPP. if you use test E, then go with deca. test P, go with NPP.

  3. #3
    Buster Brown's Avatar
    Buster Brown is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Proud Bostonian
    Posts
    4,722
    NPP does NOT make you hold less water then deca nor does prop allow you to hold less water then enanthate THAT is a myth. The Esther of the compound does not dictate the amount of water you will hold.....diet does however. If you are cutting then obviously you will hold less water then when you are bulking.
    pasha likes this.

  4. #4
    adrenaline99's Avatar
    adrenaline99 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    199
    Quote Originally Posted by Buster Brown View Post
    NPP does NOT make you hold less water then deca nor does prop allow you to hold less water then enanthate THAT is a myth. The Esther of the compound does not dictate the amount of water you will hold.....diet does however. If you are cutting then obviously you will hold less water then when you are bulking.
    That's what I was thinking! Then why is NNP so highly touted if it just means more injections?

  5. #5
    derekkpapa1's Avatar
    derekkpapa1 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Northeast usa
    Posts
    4,651
    Less bloat
    out of your system quicker
    Less sides
    can make changes and take effect almost right away
    A 8 week npp cyclr is equal to 12 week deca cycle

  6. #6
    pasha is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    everywhere/anywhere
    Posts
    208
    Interesting... i did not know.

  7. #7
    tice1212's Avatar
    tice1212 is offline Productive Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    1,562
    Quote Originally Posted by adrenaline99 View Post

    That's what I was thinking! Then why is NNP so highly touted if it just means more injections?
    Couple of reasons i can come up with
    1. Its in ur system faster
    2. u can run a 8 week cycle. Which means ur not shut down for to long.
    3. If u run test p then nnp would be a better choice IMO. If u run longer esters then run deca with it.

  8. #8
    Buster Brown's Avatar
    Buster Brown is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Proud Bostonian
    Posts
    4,722
    It seems that NPP and deca aren't as popular choices since most labs offer tren . This wasn't always the case...... In the early 90's tes/deca/ and an oral were considered "the" cycle to be on. A lot of guys when doing a cutter run tes p and tren a or include mast.... Npp is still a great compound just depends on your goals.... I like a low dose of deca on a bulk for joint relief which tren e does not offer. Conversely on a cut I prefer tren a over NPP........ Even with all its crazy sides.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •