Printable View
I am currently on my first test enanthate cycle but already trying to put my second one in plan. I can buy only ampoules and they come like this 200mg/1ML cypionate and 250mg/1ML enanthate price is the same for both, should I stick with the enth. beacause of the +50 mg or try cypionate or are they the same?
Test is test, cyp and enth are almost the same
If they are the same price id go enanthate more test for your buck :)
Test is Test
If both are pharma then more for the buck.
250mg wont do much for a cycle 500mg is a good beginner dose if building muscle is your goal
i was wondering if 200 cyp has the same power, effects as 250 enth, both having the same price ...Quote:
Originally Posted by djgreen
my current cycle is 500mg test / week + dbol 40mg 4 weeks.. the next one will be at least 750 mg test pining 3 times per week
its legit stuff, i'm from the eastern europe and we don't have fakes over here just cheep steroids.. one ampoule of test is 3.75$ same price as a cigarette pack
250mg of test E is more potent than 200mg of test C.Quote:
Originally Posted by aurelian87
As a matter of fact, 200mg of test E is about 1% more potent then 200mg of test C.
Therefore 250mg of test E is about 23% more potent than 200mg of test C.
Exactly...In my opinion the longer the ester the easier your body can filter bits of pieces here and there out of your systemQuote:
Originally Posted by The Deadlifting Dog
Well damn. Now I have to move.Quote:
Originally Posted by aurelian87
Some opinions are best kept private...like those without any evidence or logic behind them .Quote:
Originally Posted by davidtheman100
I liked your first reply also.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonaparte
I've found the people who measure statistics, logic and technicalities as a way to sculpt themselves in bodybuilding end up looking the most like shit...Whoops did it againQuote:
Originally Posted by Bonaparte
LOL. So logic and facts are only useful to nerds. Christ...Quote:
Originally Posted by davidtheman100
Let me repeat myself... "I've found the people who measure statistics, logic and technicalities as a way to sculpt themselves in bodybuilding end up looking the most like shit...Whoops did it again"Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonaparte
Nowhere in there did it say any of what you said above?^
That's exactly what you implied: that logic and facts are not conducive to BBing and we should just make up our own bro-science. If not, then you may want to rewrite that.Quote:
Originally Posted by davidtheman100
thank you for the replys i will stick with the test enth.