Which Cycle Would be More Mild?

[boisebeast]

Hypothetical question, I'm curious to hear opinions on this...

All things aside (genetics, number of cycles done, potential for mass gains, etc.) which of the following cycles would be more mild in terms of side effects:

1) Test E at 500mg/week
2) Test E at 200 mg/week and Deca at 200 mg/week

Let's assume each cycle is for the same amount of time and would have proper AI and on-cycle support supplementation as well as appropriate PCTs. Obviously everyone reacts to compounds differently, but just generally speaking, which cycle would you say would yield the more mild side effects? I ask because I've seen a lot of people opt for #2 over #1 recently and it's sparked my curiosity. I'd love to hear your reasoning as well if you're willing to give it

[reporich]

The second one won't do much, the Deca is way to low.

[djgreen]

200mg of test wont do much at all for gains

[boisebeast]

The second one won't do much, the Deca is way to low.

200mg of test wont do much at all for gains

Disregard the gains, just talking purely sides

[AR's King Silabolin]

The last one if you got the knowhow. The first one if you dont bother to do research.
Meaning, deca is one of the mildels if you know how to use it and what to take with it. One of the worse if you just shoot.

I disagree with nogainsstatement. 200 mg test and 200 mg deca could really improve a physic if the athlete responds well.