Test VS EQ

[GoldChest]

I have Test E 200mg/ml and EQ 200mg/ml.
My options are:

A) Test E 400mg EW + EQ 600mg EW

Or

B) Test E 600mg EW + EQ 400mg EW

Or

C) Test E 500mg EW + EQ 500mg EW

What would be the better option?
I will run it for 12 weeks, and yes, i do have my PCT planned.
My goal is lean mass, and im leaning towards the option A, because of the less bloating, i bloat a lot lol

Im 26yr, 1,81/6'0, 86kg with 10-11%BF.
This is my 3rd cycle.

[reporich]

I'd go with "A".

[davidtheman100]

None of them make any sense...EQ needs to be ran at LEAST 500-600mg and at least 16 weeks for good results....Might as well just do B to take advantage of the high test levels for 12 weeks but don't expect nothing amazing otherwise because 12 weeks isn't much if you're running EQ as well....From about the 7-8 week mark it will kick in and that leaves you about 4-5 weeks of getting gains from it....I'd extend cycle to 16 weeks and do 600mg test 800mg EQ and you will love your results...Otherwise do B

[reporich]

I missed the part of only running 12 weeks. I like EQ and run it most of the year with TRT and have always ran it 20 weeks. Like David said 12 is a waste.

[marcus300]

Forget eq its completely pointless and useless in muscle building, its just a waste of oil.

[clarky.]

Forget eq its completely pointless and useless in muscle building, its just a waste of oil.

been waiting on this big man lol

[mark woods]

Lots of people don't like eq...but if your after slow steady quality gains and not put on 30lbs in a few weeks(and make it too obvious)I would run it but min 16 weeks is needed at a min 500mg.