Printable View
Would you say a Test E only cycle, with a Dbol kicker is underrated - without adding things like tren,deca etc?
I've been reading around and this has come up, and just wondering what you think?
For example, what do you think is better :
1) 500mg Test E/week
2) 500mg Test E/week + 200mg Tren E/week (so a low dose)
better ask yourself,for who is better,and for what goal?Quote:
Originally Posted by ZiggyStarman
its not just the dosages or supstance,its the person that will take these supstances,is it his first cycle,in what condition the person is,what is his weight? how old is he ?what does he want from it?
steroids shouldnt be underrated,any of them,it can be fatal,or it can be relatively safe if you are carefull with it,but no drug,even a pain kill pill shouldnt be underrated
What's your stats?
Age
Height
Weight
Bodyfat
What's your cycle history?
First off how many cycles have u done.
If anyone thought that a test e cycle is overrated I would either think these three things, their diet wasn't where it needed it be for their goals, their training wasn't up to par, or the gear was fake.
I would honestly say that test e is a great cycle. Ur test levels are out of this world and my sex drive is insane. Gains are pretty damn good as well. Now do I think that u can get better gain with other compounds added with ur test e cycle, of course BUT at the same time a bunch more side effects come with those other compound. Now imagine u got on a test/dbol cycle and u started getting some unwanted side effect but u don't know what compound is causing that side. So with starting with a test cycle only its best to see how ur body response. Study urself, understand what is going on, take notes for future reference.
26Quote:
Originally Posted by TheTaxMan
5'11
89kg (Just over 14 stone)
12%.
Previously just a Test E cycle at 500mg/week, with 4 weeks of Dbol kickstart.
Got no bad sides other than my acne flared up a bit more on my back.
Id rate a test and tren cycle better than test only.
But for a second cycle i wouldnt touch tren yet, you dont need it, plenty of room to grow safely without it.
You could do the same cycle again, you could do test only
Test is definatley not overated, nor is test only cycles, they are great as long as ones diet and training are dialed in.
You could look into nandrolone (deca) for a second cycle, its quite common for a second cycle
Test is the main thing. SO I wouldn't say its underrated at all. I have only ran test only cycles and have seen great results with both.
If It was me make sure your diet is on point and run test only for your second cycle. You don't need tren or anything else yet to make gains. Get everything out of test only before adding another compound. I am even thinking about running it again for 3rd cycle. Test is King in steroids in my opinion.
It would be if you have only ran Test bodacious :lol:
However i do agree with you, they say test is best dont they.
I do love nandrolone and trenbolobe though, look forward to another tren cycle.
Great advice though, reap all the rewards from test only cycles before adding other stuff is often advised. Grow into compounds and grow into doseages.
Cheers fellas, i'll go with that :-)
Another question quick : Is the ability to keep gains after cycle effected at all by how many compounds you run?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZiggyStarman
No. Nutrition, training, genetics.