Dumb noob Q about anabolic vs androgenic?

**borlef** · 04-18-2016, 10:25 PM

So it sounds to me like it is much more favorable to be skewed in favor of anabolics rather than androgenic , is that right?

It sounds like the bad side effects of libido, hair loss, etc come from androgenic side.

Can someone please elaborate...

**borlef** · 04-19-2016, 08:44 PM

Can anyone enlighten please?

Everything I've been reading is saying Pro Anabol Negative on Androgens.

**Doyouevenbruh** · 04-19-2016, 09:11 PM

Edit

**borlef** · 04-20-2016, 12:37 PM

Originally Posted by Doyouevenbruh

Edit

What does that mean?

**Doyouevenbruh** · 04-20-2016, 10:36 PM

Well I had a response to your questions. But I had to edit a ratio but somehow deleted the response, which left, edit.

**borlef** · 04-20-2016, 10:39 PM

Originally Posted by Doyouevenbruh

Well I had a response to your questions. But I had to edit a ratio but somehow deleted the response, which left, edit.

OK, enlightening. Edit.

**Doyouevenbruh** · 04-20-2016, 10:41 PM

So basically what I wrote was. Hormones have sides. Your thinking anabolic hormones don't have sides like hair loss and such. The first thing that I thought was masteron has a ratio of 65:25 anabolic over androgenic ( I think that's right). Masteron in my experience is horrible on hair.I also think you should spend some time reading about hormones and the effects they have on the body. What are you thinking about running?