Results 1 to 10 of 10
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Mr.BB

Thread: IM vs. Sub Q

  1. #1
    Az0342 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    44

    IM vs. Sub Q

    Looking for some input on this subject. I was on TRT, for a short period, prescribed by two different physicians, 1 had me doing IM and the other sub Q. I preferred the sub Q over IM but I was only doing .4 cc's, I imagine that doing a sub Q injection around a cc or more might not be ideal. Thanks for any feedback and I'm sorry if this is the wrong spot or gone over too many times.

  2. #2
    Megalodon6's Avatar
    Megalodon6 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    I'm Ron Burgundy?
    Posts
    805
    I do IM and I have no complaints if it ain't broke don't fix it. I have seen a few guys on here say that they do sub q and are pleased with it. How long were did you do IM and how long did you do sub q?

  3. #3
    Az0342 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    44
    I did IM for 10 weeks and sub q for about the same. I rotated the IM between the delts and glutes bilaterally. Didn't care for the ache following IM for the next day or so, overall it wasn't bad. I guess my concern is how would a full cc or more of a long ester test feel sub q?

  4. #4
    InternalFire is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    2,259
    Quote Originally Posted by Az0342
    I did IM for 10 weeks and sub q for about the same. I rotated the IM between the delts and glutes bilaterally. Didn't care for the ache following IM for the next day or so, overall it wasn't bad. I guess my concern is how would a full cc or more of a long ester test feel sub q?
    Try and find out. If its pharma it should be smooth and well, little to none pip. If its ugl, I can almost put my bets you will be sorry to try that subQ , I cant even get away with 50mg subq without severe PIP, while same ugl gave zero PIP as of now 36+ hours after 175mg test-e IM administration Its alot of trial and error, give it a try let us all know! Member here Proximal , is on TRT and doing it subQ, he also recently ran a cycle subQ method and had zero issues with absorption, so that was fine for him, and I believe throughout he used pharma test Sent from my eyePhone

  5. #5
    Az0342 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    44
    I imagine everybody tolerates these differently. Thanks!

  6. #6
    kelkel's Avatar
    kelkel is offline HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~ No Source Checks
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    East Coast Dungeon
    Posts
    30,121
    SQ is not meant for large volume. Ever. Unless you like absorption issues and lumps.
    -*- NO SOURCE CHECKS -*-

  7. #7
    Mr.BB's Avatar
    Mr.BB is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    HOME
    Posts
    6,902
    Over 0.2ml of pharma testoviron leaves bumps doing sub-q.

    Oil is meant to be injected IM.
    chab likes this.

  8. #8
    Az0342 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    44
    Thank you. I'll stick to IM.

  9. #9
    Ashop's Avatar
    Ashop is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    9,933
    I prefer DEEP IM for all my injects.

  10. #10
    robb_theyoungwolf is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    22
    what kelkel said. stick with IM for oil injections

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •