So most of us frown on cycles without test, and not something I'm gonna do cause I remember all to well how it felt last time I dropped test for 5 weeks while still staying on DBOL.
But, after some discussion with a friend and his experiences I began to think.
His approach was to run Tren only. I asked WTF?
Now, after some talking i realized it wasn't Tren only, but Tren and proviron only.
According to him, (which had done this several times, running quite long cycles, or blasts more proper to say),
his statement was that nothing got him so lean and he had no sexual sides and felt great.
Ok, I can see the point about getting ripped, for if you drop test then many compounds that otherwise cause water retention doesn't. Like my own experiences with DBOL, shredded as fuck without test. However, felt like shot too. (And probably very unhealthy, just felt plain unhealthy)
If one goes back to Arnold's era I'm sure they often dropped test out of the equation due to lack of AIs,
which u wouldn't need with a Tren, proviron cycle f.ex.
What got me thinking is that proviron should provide all the DHT stimulus needed for sexual function.
Without test E2 will fall, perhaps too low, but I can see you'll get ripped.
Anybody tried substituting test with proviron?
Would be intresting to know if this would negate much of the need for test. On the other hand, I like my test and won't try this as an experiment. I get ripped enough by just adding an AI.
Thoughts?