Ive heard this again and again when scanning forums on various different sites. "Tren is more of a lean bulker, for bulking I recommend Deca and test rather than tren and test".
For someone who is gazing at the calander chomping at the bit waiting for the next bulk Im just curious if this is true? Its hard for me to believe Tren (based on what Ive read) could be beaten by deca in the bulking department. Ive tried tren before but never Deca..
For those that know and can help me out... is Deca truly supperior to Tren for the purpose of bulking? Those anyone know the scientific benefit for why Deca may be better? Or is this all a myth?
Here is an example of something I read online that was posted on a forum "Deca is you want to put on mass.
Just like a poster above said. Tren made me gain but it was more of a cleaner look. Deca turned me into a walking water balloon, but I got huge."
--- I have no idea what the hell this man meant. Deca for putting on mass... I looked like a water balloon but I got huge... okay Im not sure if thats good or bad.
In otherwords when the cycle is all said and done which compound will you put on more muscle with. Im not interested in water bloat during cycle or additional fat or anything. Just which put on more muscle. Am I to understand that the muscle that is built on Tren looks different than that ok muscle built on Deca? This is the impression that I get from listening to people but this doesnt seen logical at all