Results 1 to 12 of 12
-
03-28-2017, 09:22 PM #1Junior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Posts
- 90
Total noob question: what are benefits of HGH vs. Steroids?
It seems like most people gear up with test or tren or something like that. But what about HGH? I've heard a lot about it for it's help in healing. Seems like people take it for much longer. Can someone please explain the differences in use, reason to take one vs the other.
-
03-28-2017, 09:57 PM #2
Hgh is not a aas. It has many qualities for healing and can even increase bone density. It has been shown to nearly double recovery time after some surgerys. Many consider it the closest thing to the fountain of youth. It is extremely expensive and only pharma grade will suffice.
Tren is an advanced steroid for advanced users. Not for anyone short of 5 or 6 cycles under their belt. It is a very powerful lean mass gainer and should not be ran without testosterone . Tren arguably has the most side effects for most but it seems some are totall unaffected by it (I think they are full of shit).
-
03-28-2017, 10:08 PM #3
Apples to oranges. GH isn't going to give you what anabolics do in terms of sheer size and strength. It's a good compliment to anabolics, and I do feel there is a synergistic effect while using both. GH, as was just said, is a fountain of youth compound so to speak. It helps with sleep quality, mood, aches and pains, fat loss, and a host of other benefits. Pharmacy grade is about all I'm willing to trust, as its faked more than not. There are some really good ugl GH out there, but there is so many variables to it. You might get a super batch one time, then a weak or bunk batch. Sources are at the mercy of their sources when it comes to GH. Anabolics are hormones derived from testosterone . They give more bang for the buck. You add mass or lean up. That all depends on your diet. If I had to choose 1,and body composition was my goal, anabolics for sure. And there is a lot of people who claim 6 months minimum on running GH. I agree thats when you're going to start really noticing the benefits. However, I think if one chooses GH, there should not be a set timeline. It should be ran for as long as money allows. I used to buy a few kits and reorder when funds got back up. I never ran it under a year, ever. I just don't see the point in running something that is possibly costing you well over a 1k or more a month for a set 6 months. If I'm spending that much, it is going to be long long term.
-
03-28-2017, 10:17 PM #4
-
03-31-2017, 05:26 PM #5Associate Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2016
- Posts
- 167
Waste of money unless youre over 40 and want to stay young. Imho
-
03-31-2017, 05:57 PM #6
-
03-31-2017, 05:59 PM #7
-
03-31-2017, 08:21 PM #8
-
03-31-2017, 08:36 PM #9
-
03-31-2017, 09:02 PM #10
-
03-31-2017, 11:22 PM #11
-
04-01-2017, 10:49 AM #12Junior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2016
- Posts
- 62
I'm 41 and look 34 without taking anything. Some just look younger. But also depends on the day (tired, didn't sleep well etc) and lighting.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS