Results 1 to 18 of 18
-
07-21-2003, 09:58 AM #1Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Posts
- 1,266
Fina without a kit and filters, I want some feed back on this method
Has anyone else trying this method other than MeBoach... I want to hear from someone else who has used this method or one similar...
Originally Posted by MeBoach
-
07-21-2003, 11:43 AM #2
sorry havent tried this method but had a ques. all in all when it comes to the time you put into it and other oils & alch's you buy isnt is just as cheap to buy a kit
-
07-21-2003, 12:14 PM #3Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Posts
- 1,266
Actually, I'm curious about the accurate dosage part... does the filter make that much difference??? Is the glue and die a hazard? Is there a substance in Finaplix -H that must be filtered out? That’s my question. I’m just throwing this up because I would either like to here horror stories or high achievement stories…
This is the link I got the post from...
http://www.anabolicreview.com/vbulle...?threadid=7071
-
07-21-2003, 12:20 PM #4Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Posts
- 1,266
MeBoach, have you suffered an adverse reaction or any anomalies using everclear as the alcohol... This is going to set me on a need to know mission... ohoh...
Originally Posted by MeBoachLast edited by mmaximus25; 07-21-2003 at 12:27 PM.
-
07-21-2003, 12:23 PM #5Originally Posted by mmaximus25
-
07-21-2003, 12:40 PM #6Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Posts
- 1,266
Originally Posted by big N
The largest reason I'm a "need to know person" is because more times that none people are afraid of what they don’t know about or understand and can't explain.
If there is a simple safe way to get a higher concentration of fina then why not....
I've read both methods with filters and without they seem equal in complexity... I'm looking for testimonials or from anyone that has a good answer as to why not... That’s your Queue Billy...
Warrior you have some experience in this area how about it...
-
07-21-2003, 12:54 PM #7Originally Posted by mmaximus25
-
07-21-2003, 01:07 PM #8Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Posts
- 1,266
Originally Posted by big N
I was interested to know if the filters were removing a substance from the pellets that is harmful... Only because some feel the filters cause a miss calculated dose.... thats the whole fact finding mission for me.... thx for the input...
This is for 1..cartridge of finaplix -h and 1... 2gm kit
With a 3% loss of product in the conversion
If you do everything correctly the Oil(mls) to mg strenth would be as follows.
If you were to use only "X" amount of oil, you will have your fina at "X" strength
10ml = 194mg/ml
11ml = 176mg/ml
12ml = 161mg/ml
13ml = 149mg/ml
14ml = 138mg/ml
15ml = 129mg/ml
16ml = 121mg/ml
17ml = 114mg/ml
18ml = 107mg/ml
19ml = 102mg/ml
20ml = 97mg/ml
21ml = 92mg/ml
22ml = 88mg/ml
23ml = 84mg/ml
24ml = 80mg/ml
25ml = 77mg/ml
A word of caution. Some kits have 5mls of magic solution (this is the main factor of pain) and some only have 3mls.
So most people that have tried to convert a higher mg product just take out the oil.
This raises the ratio of "solution to oil" mixture....Which causes the more painful injections.
A better way to raise it would be to add more pellets to a 2gm kit
I"ll do an experiment to see how much can be converted in 3mls on "magic solution"..
and report on it with numbers.
So unless you know and understand the ins and outs of this,
Just stick with converting with all the product(finaplix pellets), oil and magic solution.
*************************************************
This is for 2..cartridge2 of finaplix-h and 1... 4gm kit
With a 3% loss of product in the conversion
If you do everything correctly the
Oil(mls) to mg strenth would be as follows.
35ml = 110mg/ml
36ml = 108mg/ml
37ml = 104mg/ml
38ml = 102mg/ml
39ml = 99mg/ml
40ml = 97mg/ml
41ml = 95mg/ml
42ml = 92mg/ml
43ml = 90mg/ml
44ml = 88mg/ml
45ml = 86mg/ml
46ml = 84mg/ml
47ml = 82mg/ml
48ml = 80mg/ml
49ml = 79mg/ml
50ml = 77mg/ml
-
07-21-2003, 02:37 PM #9Originally Posted by mmaximus25
-
07-21-2003, 03:56 PM #10
It seems to me like MeBoach's method is much more of a pain in the ass than just doing the kit. Sure, it takes longer in one sitting than MeBoach's method, but with his method you have to do it every time you want to take shot. I'd rather just go through the hassle one time and make mass quantities of it rather than do that process ed.
As far as using the kit and the filters goes, I'd rather do that than risk the possible infection. It's good that MeBoach hasn't had any problems so far, but it would just seem wiser to filter it to try and make it more sterile. I'm sure the Everclear helps make everything sterile, but the filtering is extra good measure. As BigN said, it's pressure that holds the pellets together. The "gunk" found when using the kit is just the medium that the pellet manufacturers use to put the active ingredient trenbolone in. Most pills are just talc of some sort with the active ingredient mixed in, and then pressed togther with a pill press. If tren were 17AA, you could just swallow the pellet, and it would be no different than swallowing any other tab like dbol , anadrol , winny, primobolan , etc. I'm not sure how sterile the manufacturing facility is that makes Fina, but I'm sure it's reasonably sterile. But, perhaps not as sterile as a lab that makes American Anadrol, or something like that.
Bottom line, it seems like the kit would be easier since you can make a bunch of it at one time instead of having to make a shot everyday.
-
07-21-2003, 04:05 PM #11
That method is ignorant IMO and would never do it and would advice against it. Its unsterile for one. Secondly injeting methylcellulose in your muscle is just stupid. Your body doesnt break down cellulose FYI.
Any %loss in a conversion is of the total volume, not concentration. I dont know if you realised it or not, as I didnt feel like going through your calculations.
Do not use 4g's in a 2g kit. Kit makers dont just put in extra solvent in there (pain + cost). You do that and you may actually be wasting tren as it will not suspend and you will not be able to tell the difference in the methylcellulose and the tren anyways so there will be no way to tell really.
-
07-21-2003, 04:28 PM #12Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Posts
- 1,266
Originally Posted by Billy_Bathgate
-
07-21-2003, 04:41 PM #13
Ive made 450mg/ml easily...sure as hell didnt inject it though, mixed it with my EQ, Deca , and Test though and ended painfree...
The important part is to make sure its all dissolved. 2g will dissolve in 3-5ml of solvent...but 4g may not completely, know what I mean?
Thats why its better to manipulate how much oil you add. Do that and you can get about any concentration you want...(within reason)
-
07-21-2003, 05:59 PM #14Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Posts
- 98
2000mg hormone divided by mg of tren = mL's. 2000mg displaces 2mg +4mg BA minus Total MLs= Ml of oil. Example 2000/74=27ml total. 2ml hormone + 4ml Ba + 21ml oil= 27ml/74mg tren. We lost about 1 ml worth of product after the filtering process so we ended up about 26mls. So I guess if you would add in 2100 hormone next time it could make up for that extra ml. Who really knows. I hope this wasn't confusing.
Last edited by Grand_Cannons; 07-21-2003 at 06:01 PM.
-
07-21-2003, 07:42 PM #15Originally Posted by Grand_Cannons
You loose 1ml of of 74mg/ml tren leaving you with 26ml of 74mg/ml
you do NOT end up with 26ml of 72mg/ml, the concentration is unaffected as what you loose is already mixed and at a set concentration
IF you added in another 100mg tren, youd end up with like 26ml of about 76mg/ml
-
05-30-2004, 08:35 PM #16New Member
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Posts
- 9
Originally Posted by mmaximus25
-
06-05-2004, 06:06 PM #17New Member
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Posts
- 9
why the everclear why not crush the pellets mix with water and place cotton in the shot glass and pull the dissolved fina up in the needle then inject it will be water based like suspesion you have to do it every day so why not in water iv never converted before so i dont know iv just done the dmso method im not sure what i think anyone have good results transdermally
-
07-23-2004, 08:35 AM #18Originally Posted by kcwoo
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Expired dbol (blue hearts)
01-11-2025, 04:00 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS