Dbol and EQ are the exact same compound so why it's different ?

[Oxbow]

Dianabol and Boldenone are exactly the same compound if you compare the chemical structures (check on wikipedia)

One only difference : the dbol is 17-alkyled and has a CH3 methyl group on the 17 carbon, like most orals.

So I don't understand why EQ and dbol have different effects ?


Primo and Winny can also be found with esthers or 17-alkyled. So the oral and injectable forms should have different effects ?

There is something weird here.

[Cylon357]

Dianabol and Boldenone are exactly the same compound if you compare the chemical structures (check on wikipedia)

One only difference : the dbol is 17-alkyled and has a CH3 methyl group on the 17 carbon, like most orals.

So I don't understand why EQ and dbol have different effects ?


Primo and Winny can also be found with esthers or 17-alkyled. So the oral and injectable forms should have different effects ?

There is something weird here.

Nothing weird. What us lay people see as a subtle change can result in a radically different compound.

[almostgone]

It's nothing weird. Apparently the -17 AA and other differences do something because d'bol is fairly estrogenic, yet EQ isn't.

[Cuz]

They may be the same on paper but i can tell its a huge difference. Dbol is nothing more than a bloating drug if you dont take an ai with this or something to counter act the estrogen sides like mast expect alot of bloat and puffiness now the pumps look good if u just work out arms or chest but if you do any legs or back powerlift style movements the back pumps are insane

You get nowhere near the water gains with EQ . Again if you like the swole look with temporary gains that diminish 5 days after you stop taking the drug then dbol is for you

[Honkey_Kong]

It's nothing weird. Apparently the -17 AA and other differences do something because d'bol is fairly estrogenic, yet EQ isn't.

It changes how the compound metabolizes. One of the metabolites of Eq is 1,4 dienedone which has aromatase inhibiting properties. Dianabol doesn't as far as I know have this metabolite.

Tren and Nandrolone are very similarly structured too. I think there's like a 4 hydrogen atom difference between the two compounds and they have quite a bit different effects.

[Honkey_Kong]

I'd also like to say to the OP that this is a good question. Hope to see more threads like this.

[Fluidic Kimbo]

I'd also like to say to the OP that this is a good question. Hope to see more threads like this.

I agree that it's interesting...... but chemistry is beyond reasoning.

If you pull a proton out of the nucleus of a mercury atom, you get an ion of gold. Don't look for any sense in it. It is what it is.

Another one is the very unusual nature of water. . . it becomes less dense when it becomes a solid -- which is about as bat shit crazy as the universe can get. Supposedly it's to do with hydrogen bonding. Personally I think the creator wanted ice to float and to make the Titanic sink.

And then you've got antidepressants such as Escitalopram . . . the citalopram molecule comes in a 'left-handed' and 'right-handed' form (mirror image), and they affect our brain differently.

Having knowledge about the molecular structure of a compound might give you a few clues.... I mean if I see an "OH" tagged onto the end then it's probably an alcohol and will probably dissolve both polar and non-polar, but really you haven't a fucking clue what the substance will really be like, nor how it will react with other substances.

To my knowledge there still isn't an explanation for the severe psychological affects of Trenbolone.

Last I heard they were trying to make a 'left-handed sugar' that would taste just the same as normal sugar but wouldn't be absorbed by the body.