Im currently on eq 400 mg a week and test 500 mg a week, for 10 weeks. But I have enough to run it for 13 and end it with some prop. Would there be any difference in running it a couple weeks longer?
Associate Member
Im currently on eq 400 mg a week and test 500 mg a week, for 10 weeks. But I have enough to run it for 13 and end it with some prop. Would there be any difference in running it a couple weeks longer?
Retired
yes, EQ works best on longer cycles. Go the 13.
Retired~ AR-Hall of Famer
I agree also.................. Minimum EQ should be ran 12 weeks to see good results.Originally Posted by bdtr
Associate Member
sounds good to me, I dont wanna get off this stuff anyways...pumps are awesome...also, when should I cut out the enan, and hit the prop? i have enough for 3 weeks
Retired
week 10.
Associate Member
makes sense, thanks alot
Anabolic Member
Sorry to hijack but this is very similar... I was thinking I have enough to extend my cycle too... I am doing Deca and testosterone en... would it be all that bad to run 12 or 13 weeks instead of end at 10?
Associate Member
not bad, better.
Banned
OK, watch my watch: .....(The watch sways persuasively)
that's it....keep watching.....you're feeeeeling relaaaaaaxed....yeeeess.....you're feeling compli-ant..........you want to do what I saaaaay......now, repeat after me; "I need to do looonger Cyyyycles"..."I need to do loooonger Cyyyyycles"...lol
"Mooore is better".... "moooooooore is better!"
Anabolic Member
You can get quality results from EQ during a 10-week cycle. Since Equipoise (EQ) kicks in late in a cycle (around week 4-5), many people prefer to run it a bit longer.
Banned
I would go longer if you can get some more, and here is why, (as bdtr and MudMan were saying) I was just recently saying on the EQ vs. Deca poll, that I have never been that stoked on EQ like everybody else does, but a good friend of mine thinks I'm nuts 'cuz he loves it (and I can tell you it works great for him, it's quite noticable by the time he's done).
So I've been doing some research trying to find out why I've never liked it, and "most" people do. Quite some time back I did a series of 3 weeks Blitz type cycles, heavy, but short (jumping from receptor to receptor was my goal, in hopes of keepin' 'em fooled) however, I did the EQ through 3 of my 4 three week Blitz's + 1 extra week (total of 10 weeks, had a little left over) Now, the problem is, this was the Longest I'd ever ran it....yeah, I know. Even though I'd been around it, done it 3 other times before this time, and everybody else was doing it also, I'd still never heard the 3 month Minimum thing - Ever! Which really pisses me off 'cuz I was probably, for the most part, wasting it.....I was never on it long enough to see any really significant differences in comparison to other cycles I had done without it. So now I'm looking forward to tryin it again....the right way! Hell I might have a new toy for all I know, maybe I'll end up sayin' "what was I thinkin'....this stuff is Great!"
So after all that blabin' my point is from my experience + what I've now learned, run it long or don't run it.
I think bdtr (our resident Government Roid Test Droid) runs 1 50 mil. bottle everyday for 6 months...not sure.
(Just messin' with 'ya Stud)
Anabolic Member
You know I dont need much incouragement, hehehe, I almost have nothing to loose since I was already almost dead in the natural testosterone production department before this cycle anyways.... like doctors kept telling me, I needed HRT so bad I am likely to have health problems if I dont get it.OK, watch my watch: .....(The watch sways persuasively)
that's it....keep watching.....you're feeeeeling relaaaaaaxed....yeeeess.....you're feeling compli-ant..........you want to do what I saaaaay......now, repeat after me; "I need to do looonger Cyyyycles"..."I need to do loooonger Cyyyyycles"...lol
"Mooore is better".... "moooooooore is better!"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote