Results 1 to 6 of 6
Thread: Nolvadex Vs. Arimidex
-
02-23-2004, 09:53 PM #1
Nolvadex Vs. Arimidex
ok guys...which one of these would you rather have in your cycle if cost wasn't a factor...some say that arimidex works better, but can hinder gains...and we definately dont want our gains hindered ....so vote and tell us what you think about each
P.S. this includes the liquid reserch chemicals
-
02-23-2004, 09:57 PM #2Respected Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Miller's Crossing
- Posts
- 6,270
Can't be compared. Ones a SERM, the other an AI. Both are necessary IMO
Both are readily available and feasibly priced
Neither inhibits gains
-
02-23-2004, 10:02 PM #3
like pheedno said both do different things and should be used in every cycle...however you could probly get away with just having nolva on hand in case gyno shows up...
-
02-23-2004, 10:05 PM #4
minus being as smart as pheedno.... i used arimidex for my first cycle .5 mg ED, got gyno, increased arimidex, to no prevail, i was a dumbass and had no nolva on hand and my gyno just got worse.... 6 wks after end of my cycle it went away naturally
ft-
-
02-23-2004, 10:07 PM #5Originally Posted by floyd_turbo
-
02-23-2004, 10:09 PM #6
without a question
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS