Arimdex/Nolvadex

G-S · 02-03-2002, 03:00 PM

Opinions on which is better, or should I say "more effective".

I have arimidex , but have been reading alot on here of guys reccomending nolva. Was just wondering if one was better, or had better advantages.

**PaPaPumP** · 02-03-2002, 03:14 PM

Everyone will say arimidex .

I used arimidex last cycle, and still got gyno symptoms, therefore, i am using both this cycle. .5mg arimidex, 5mg nolva. Covered all my bases, IGF-1 reduction with nolva?? Better than a set of titties.

**PaPaPumP** · 02-03-2002, 03:15 PM

BTW, there is new stuff called Aromasin that knocks out all estrogen at a rate of 98% percent when taken at 25mg a day. Everyone ask your "sources" about this, see if they have it. It's the new and improved arimidex .

G-S · 02-03-2002, 03:15 PM

I plan on using .25 per day of arimidex . I was told that I will not have any gyno symptons with that amount. Is that correct?

**BOZZ** · 02-03-2002, 03:27 PM

Hey PapaPump is Aromasin the stuff they were talking about in the latest issue of MD??? If so it sounds like some good shit.

**PaPaPumP** · 02-03-2002, 03:29 PM

What are your doses?

**Triple Plates** · 02-03-2002, 03:38 PM

Is Aromasin more then armidex?

G-S · 02-03-2002, 10:21 PM

Originally posted by Gettin Stupid
I plan on using .25 per day of arimidex. I was told that I will not have any gyno symptons with that amount. Is that correct?

Well? Yes or No?

**PaPaPumP** · 02-03-2002, 10:28 PM

Originally posted by PaPaPumP
What are your doses?

**NightOp** · 02-03-2002, 10:54 PM

http://www.fda.gov/cder/foi/label/1999/20753lbl.pdf

aromasin is new and yes it VERY powerful, goto the above link to check it out, this stuff is different from arimidex in that it PERMANETLY binds to the aromatase... I would like to read a good article or post from a vet about how much estrogen is needed to function naturally (when not on roids), imean if almost NO estrogens are present, major organ problems develop right? im far far from an expert on this stuff so please read mroe about it before even considering...

**JP1570** · 02-03-2002, 11:42 PM

So you're basically saying that if this stuff permanently binds to receptors, you only need to take it one time?

**PaPaPumP** · 02-03-2002, 11:45 PM

I think he means permanently as long as you keep taking it. I don't think it's "permanently" meaning forever, however I could be wrong, as I know near to nothing about the substance. anyone?

**JP1570** · 02-03-2002, 11:48 PM

Yea, I got a couple pages through the study on it and decided I would need a translator to go on. Regardless, it sounds like some pretty amazing stuff and I will definitely ask my local distributors about it.

**NightOp** · 02-04-2002, 12:13 AM

ya i dont know jack about this stuff either, like i said i would wait to hear about this stuff from a vet/mod... and hopefully an answer to my question about the dangers of TOTAL estrogen suppression

G-S · 02-04-2002, 06:16 AM

Originally posted by PaPaPumP
What are your doses?

.25 per day, as I initially stated.

**NightOp** · 02-04-2002, 12:50 PM

wow, what are your cycle dosages/drugs?

**arthurb999** · 02-04-2002, 12:55 PM

Originally posted by Gettin Stupid

.25 per day, as I initially stated.

I think papa meant your dosages of the juice. For example, if you were taking like 800 mg of test a week, 0.25mg of arimidex ed probably will not be sufficent.