
Originally Posted by
chunky monkey
2 part-question:
1) For those who have run both, what would you say is the mg equivalent of EQ as compared to 400mg tren enth? ie. 400mg tren enth = 600mg EQ? 800mg EQ?
2) Cost aside, at an equivalent potency, which would you rather run (from a gains vs. sides perspective)?
I could be wrong, but it seems that running EQ makes more sense: less sides + no need for extra ancillaries like bromo or B6, and if you're running enough the gains should be similar.
Just in the planning stages for my winter bulker that will probably start in late November. Test will be the base; the side I'm most concerned with is hair loss, nothing else really matters much.
Thanks for the help guys.