Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 44

Thread: norma deca and paki sus

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    303

    norma deca and paki sus

    real or fake
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	100_1180.JPG 
Views:	920 
Size:	552.9 KB 
ID:	57687   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	100_1181.JPG 
Views:	1428 
Size:	573.1 KB 
ID:	57688   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	100_1182.JPG 
Views:	1060 
Size:	587.8 KB 
ID:	57689   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	100_1183.JPG 
Views:	429 
Size:	541.5 KB 
ID:	57690  

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Land of hope and glory
    Posts
    100
    the sus look pretty damn good to me bro. 3 of the Decas look good but the one looks to be bigger and have slightly dodgy looking crimps...... amyone else think that?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    303
    thanks for the feed back

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    303
    what about the sus

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Land of hope and glory
    Posts
    100
    yeah those sus look bang on to me me mate, they are exactly like the ones i'm on at the moment and they seem to be working well

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    303
    just got them and started this tuesday got a sore but

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    303
    my heart rate seems to have picked up the pace

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Land of hope and glory
    Posts
    100
    yeah mine too, i'm only on the sus with D-bols. Apparently the Deca takes a bit of the sting out of the jab?

  9. #9
    I had that deca like 6 months ago.. it looked like that but i'm not sure about every little detail

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    303
    thanks for the feed back all the info is well welcome

  11. #11
    i did alittle searchin around for ya.. and i'm like 99% your deca is good to go

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    303
    thanks man i got probally 10hrs on this web forum getting pics and info i was 99.9% sure they were but im new so an outside source like this forum is good feedback

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Land of hope and glory
    Posts
    100
    here you go bro; this is my paki sus along with box- had to scan it cos my camera is sh*te!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	sus.jpg 
Views:	481 
Size:	62.5 KB 
ID:	57696  

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    303
    thanks for the pic man much appreciated

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    1,393
    "grizzly420" - your norma looks suspicious to me. Mostly crimps. I also never seen different amps size in the case of Norma. A I know, Norma has always very uniform amp size - no smaller or taller amps.
    Take a look at my Norma:
    http://forums.steroid.com/attachment...chmentid=51461
    http://forums.steroid.com/attachment...chmentid=51462
    http://forums.steroid.com/attachment...chmentid=51463
    http://forums.steroid.com/attachment...chmentid=51464
    http://forums.steroid.com/attachment...chmentid=51465
    http://forums.steroid.com/attachment...chmentid=51477
    http://forums.steroid.com/attachment...chmentid=51479
    http://forums.steroid.com/attachment...chmentid=51480
    I'll beter wait for another guys (SJ, powerBB, Judge_dread, ..) , point of view.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    2,240
    Im no expert, but the pic second from the left..
    The middle two vials... the vial second from the left looke scratched on the bottom of the crimp like it was done all sloppy.. and the on second from the right looks unevenly crimped; sort of wavey crimp...

    Quick edit.:

    On the word "nandrolone"? Is that the right "E" or not? I remember another topic like this where i think it was SJ or michaelcc that pointed the difference of the "E"....little underhang on the bottom of the E.... Is it right or not?
    However it looks right...
    http://forums.steroid.com/attachment...chmentid=51463
    Just pointing out details.
    Last edited by SnaX; 10-27-2005 at 02:43 PM.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    303
    MichaelCC if you look at your attachment 51462 your far right amp looks taller also or is just me

  18. #18
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    1,393
    Quote Originally Posted by Grizzly420
    MichaelCC if you look at your attachment 51462 your far right amp looks taller also or is just me
    sorry bro, but you are wrong. Maybe it's becasue of pictuers, but all amps has the same height. You can see it easily on another pictures too. All pictures was done with same 5 pieces of norma. I have no differences between amps size, but you has. And your difference is very good visible. it's not only me who found it out.
    If you think your normas are right, it's your opinion. My opinion is, it's not right. The taller one for sure ...

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    303
    MichealCC thanks for your response i greatly appreciate it alot that is the only one that is that way
    Last edited by Grizzly420; 10-27-2005 at 08:25 PM.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    eastern Europe
    Posts
    99
    I believe that bigger amp of deca is not good but the rest looks very good to me, as for the sust I'm sure it is good

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Land of the rising sun.
    Posts
    3,245
    Grizzly, were your decas lined all in the same distance when you took the pics?
    Big Mike, I think the difference is due to the unlined vials the "smaller" one seems
    to be a little far from the other ones? But hell yeah, Big Mike you're a good
    observer! My opinion is that they are good to go, the crimps, fonts of label,
    batch/exp match and the letter "E" as Snax said is the right "E" in Grizzly's vials.
    If they came from North, you're good to go, bro!

  22. #22
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    1,393
    Thanx for your input SJ, but anyway I think, somethings wrong with the taller deca. I never said these Normas are fake, but this one (taller) looks very suspicions to me. If there were Egypt sustanons, there will be no problems with different amp size, but there are Normas and that's why I'm little bit suspicions about it.
    Maybe it's just some kind of rarity or 1.april joke from Norma
    Or maybe, this amp is only in the cycle right now, so it's bigger than anothers

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Canada & Europe
    Posts
    4,743
    Its possible a deffect from factory but maybe dont use it.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    303
    thanks guys

  25. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by Phenom
    here you go bro; this is my paki sus along with box- had to scan it cos my camera is sh*te!
    those paki are fach im sure of that.look at the date not computer dot and the writing is one size letters rather than two.fake fake fake

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Land of hope and glory
    Posts
    100
    You reckon eh? What do you think SJ, MCC, PowerBB? you bro's are the experts on this! They seem to be working, as did the last batch i had.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Land of the rising sun.
    Posts
    3,245
    Don't listen to intensity he might be in his days...

  28. #28
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    1,393
    Even I'm not big expert in the case of Pakistan Sustanon, I also think his Sustanon is OK.

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Whistler, B.C. CANADA
    Posts
    2,625
    1000% real sustanon. You are good to go. I don't care what anyone else says, they are real. They are real.
    Last edited by juicy_brucy; 10-29-2005 at 10:06 PM.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    103
    i got those same karachi and i took it for 6 weeks for a total 3500mg and nothing no strenght,no pump,just a big 1 pounds.and they look the same like yours!

  31. #31
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    303
    thaks guys keep the feedback coming need to know i can trust me source

  32. #32
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    1,393
    Quote Originally Posted by mr.freeze
    i got those same karachi and i took it for 6 weeks for a total 3500mg and nothing no strenght,no pump,just a big 1 pounds.and they look the same like yours!
    "mr.freeze" - taking AS without paying attentions to another factors doesn't guarantee any progress. Maybe you don't know, but about 75% of everything in bodybuilding is diet and trainning. AS has smaller effect to your total progress then diet+training.
    I knew many guys who had better profit without taking AS, just with changing their diet, like another guys who were taking AS. If you pay little attention to your diet, you cannot wait for big profits. But this is theme for another forum
    Last edited by MichaelCC; 10-29-2005 at 10:45 AM.

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    103
    my diet is pretty ok!but anyways i dont want to come back to that karachi story again i had enough,just wanted to share my experience.by the way how come that all the karachi pics does not come with the original box!!! hum.....! im wondering????

  34. #34
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    303
    i have them locked up just didnt bring them out i was trying to get my pics done before my kids got up and i had alot of problems with clarity in the first set of pics i had one of the boxes i just went and looked at the bn #s and they do match
    Last edited by Grizzly420; 10-29-2005 at 12:50 PM.

  35. #35
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    eastern Europe
    Posts
    99
    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelCC
    "mr.freeze" - taking AS without paying attentions to another factors doesn't guarantee any progress. Maybe you don't know, but about 75% of everything in bodybuilding is diet and trainning. AS has smaller effect to your total progress then diet+training.
    I knew many guys who had better profit without taking AS, just with changing their diet, like another guys who were taking AS. If you pay little attention to your diet, you cannot wait for big profits. But this is theme for another forum
    well said

  36. #36
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    103
    if you got them with original box its ok! but alot of people get them with out the box.in my city people buy them in ziplock or saranwrap what a joke.

  37. #37
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Land of the rising sun.
    Posts
    3,245
    That's mean nothing, the sources just get rid of the boxes to make things easier to
    cross the borders, that's why people sometimes got their shit without boxes, if you
    get the boxes living in USA or Canada, you're lucky!

  38. #38
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Canada & Europe
    Posts
    4,743
    The Sust in the first pic is 100%.

  39. #39
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    mancester. England
    Posts
    120
    my deca look the same as yours. but my print on my E and my date seem to be not as boldly printed as yours the date on mine are E 03 2006

    it just had me wondering if mine could be fake the crimps look good to me on mine sorry no pics thas why i depend on posted like these. any advice i would be greatful

    thanx

  40. #40
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    1,393

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •