View Poll Results: Which?

Voters
21. You may not vote on this poll
  • Charger

    9 42.86%
  • Magnum

    0 0%
  • 300 C

    12 57.14%
Results 1 to 35 of 35

Thread: Which Car would you pick - Charger, Magnum, 300c.

  1. #1

    Which Car would you pick - Charger, Magnum, 300c.

    If you had a choice to buy these three cars, which one would you buy?





    Charger R/T





    Magnum R/T



    300 C

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    all up in yo' buttho'
    Posts
    2,720
    i would say the 300, because the other 2 are hideous.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    West Coast
    Posts
    883
    the 300. but he Charger is nice as well.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sooner
    Posts
    811
    300 c

    With 22in Dub Trump Spinners

  5. #5
    Id pick the magnum because i do too many things that need room, ie mtn bike, snowboard, surf, etc etc... camping, climbing...

    so id rather have a car for use rather than pure looks. if you are going just for looks, i like the way the first charger looks.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,290
    300c

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,884
    i think they're all ugly. the only reason why any of them look half decent is because they're tricked out.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Cali
    Posts
    238
    The Charger looks the best.

  9. #9
    I always liked the 300c, but yesterday I saw a Charger in the Metallic Orange colour, and it looked awesome. Although the Charger looks a little too much like the new Mustang, I like the blocky look Chrysler has going now.



    This is similiar to the one I saw.

  10. #10
    come on man the 300 srt!!! 6.1L v8 425hp!!!
    i know this isnt that model but damnnnnn



    ive seen a few they re-did with lambo doors and a soft top!!
    im looking for the pics

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by aadrenaline
    come on man the 300 srt!!! 6.1L v8 425hp!!!
    i know this isnt that model but damnnnnn
    But thats about 49,000 US dollars right? But it is a beauty.

  12. #12
    im obsessed..

    i cant find the other one

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by CAUSASIAN
    But thats about 49,000 US dollars right? But it is a beauty.
    ha yea but vipers are like 80 and you cant drive them all the time ya know
    why not spend half that and drive it all the time

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by aadrenaline
    im obsessed..

    i cant find the other one
    The Charger has the SRT version also.

    With a 6.1 L Hemi V-8 with 420 lb-ft of torque, and 425 horsepower.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Cali
    Posts
    238
    The best thing about those cars are that you can fit about 10 girls in them .

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    IRELAND.
    Posts
    4,185
    I think all three are septic looking. I drive an Alfa Romeo 156, being a European car mean's it doesn't have the massive gas gussling engines American car's do. But by jesus it looks great and handles like a dream.





    And here's mine..
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Alfa.JPG 
Views:	123 
Size:	166.3 KB 
ID:	57883   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Alfa1.JPG 
Views:	76 
Size:	277.6 KB 
ID:	57885  

  17. #17
    That is a nice car. But I really really hate Japanese and European cars (except for a BMW m3 and the Italian Exotics). I only like American cars.
    Last edited by CAUSASIAN; 10-31-2005 at 05:16 AM.

  18. #18
    Is that Alpha Romeo a four door car? And if it is, how come the back two doors dont have door handels?

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    IRELAND.
    Posts
    4,185
    Quote Originally Posted by CAUSASIAN
    Is that Alpha Romeo a four door car? And if it is, how come the back two doors dont have door handels?

    Its a four door. The rear handles are hidden to make it look like a sports coupe. And its Italian too.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    6,359
    go with the volvo

    I would pic the magnum

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    IRELAND.
    Posts
    4,185
    Quote Originally Posted by johan
    go with the volvo
    I'll consider one as a retirement present!.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    6,359
    Quote Originally Posted by BOUNCER
    I'll consider one as a retirement present!.
    volvo aint swedish quality anymore now when the damn americans have bought the company

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    IRELAND.
    Posts
    4,185
    Quote Originally Posted by johan
    volvo aint swedish quality anymore now when the damn americans have bought the company
    Fvcking yanks.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    6,359
    Quote Originally Posted by BOUNCER
    Fvcking yanks.
    amen. I bet they will make the new volvo's even ugglier than they already are

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Noo Yawk
    Posts
    624
    300C is a broke mans bentley....and im broke...and id like a bentley....so i'll take that. in the white, with some limo tints

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    189
    I would go with the 300 since I own one. charger shouldnt be four door.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    iowa
    Posts
    243
    charger i saw a black one w/22" crome rims with balck accents black windows looked like something out of space bad to the bone

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Show Me State
    Posts
    6,728
    Charger or 300c are both really nice and I've road in the 300c pretty quick also I'm sure the charger is just as quick but just guessing you've done your homework and in the end who cares besided which one makes you happy so pick the one you want and don't listen to us.

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    ON THE SHORT BUS.
    Posts
    63,652
    definitly the charger, besides being a powerful remake of the classic charger. the engine is set up so that if you are not stomping on the gas, the car only runs off of 4 of the cylinders. GAS SAVER!! Then when you need that power, just press the gas a tad harder and all 8 cylinders kick on!! and with that horsepower you will have no problem merging in front of that huge ugly SUV comin your way. Anyways... anyone have any opinions on the Subaru WRX Sti?? My assistant kitchen manager just bought one and took me for a ride... HOLY MOLY!!! these boys are fast, we ended up racing a Porshe Boxster and whooped it by like two car lengths!! Im saving my money!! lol
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	wrbluepearl.jpg 
Views:	109 
Size:	11.5 KB 
ID:	57886  

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    6,359
    Quote Originally Posted by dukkitdalaw
    definitly the charger, besides being a powerful remake of the classic charger. the engine is set up so that if you are not stomping on the gas, the car only runs off of 4 of the cylinders. GAS SAVER!! Then when you need that power, just press the gas a tad harder and all 8 cylinders kick on!! and with that horsepower you will have no problem merging in front of that huge ugly SUV comin your way. Anyways... anyone have any opinions on the Subaru WRX Sti?? My assistant kitchen manager just bought one and took me for a ride... HOLY MOLY!!! these boys are fast, we ended up racing a Porshe Boxster and whooped it by like two car lengths!! Im saving my money!! lol
    to be totaly honest with you that is one of the uggliest sports cars I have ever seen....

  31. #31
    the 300c is nicer..yea looks like a bentley and i wouldnt be afraid to drive it everywhere..if something happens its $30,000 car opposed to a $350,000
    although the continental gt is fvcking to die for..for example this one
    a 6.0L v12 twin turbo

    or


  32. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by dukkitdalaw
    Anyways... anyone have any opinions on the Subaru WRX Sti?? My assistant kitchen manager just bought one and took me for a ride... HOLY MOLY!!! these boys are fast, we ended up racing a Porshe Boxster and whooped it by like two car lengths!! Im saving my money!! lol
    My friend, who frequents this forum (RockSolid) has an STI.

    It looked ugly at first, then he spend about 15K on it, and it looked amazing. It is the fastest car, and can probably beat a Ferrari.

    But the one part that sucks about that car is the transmission. He broke his transmission, then fixed it at the dealership, it broke again, and he went to a spelity shop and got a racing grade transmission, although he drives it really bad.

  33. #33
    Dealerships are such cheaters. The MSRP for the Charger is around 30k, but they are charging 35K +, some even 40K on a 30k Charger. Because of the rare factor.

  34. #34
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    MD
    Posts
    388
    If I had too I'd go with the 300c, but I'll never buy an american made car.

  35. #35
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    MD
    Posts
    388
    Quote Originally Posted by CAUSASIAN
    Dealerships are such cheaters. The MSRP for the Charger is around 30k, but they are charging 35K +, some even 40K on a 30k Charger. Because of the rare factor.

    Thats nothing, when the Mitsubishi Evo first came over it's MSRP was around 28k-29k, my local dealer was selling them for $45k.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •