Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: EQ + Prop = cutter?

  1. #1

    EQ + Prop = cutter?

    I know there are better "cutting" stacks but I was looking for some opinions on the combination of Eq and prop. Since eq is great to stack with almost anything, especially test, I was thinking that this could be for bulking. However, I know that many use test prop for cutting as it tends cause less sides than E or C. Any thoughts on Eq and prop for cutting?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    cairo/egypt
    Posts
    2,724
    eq+prop+cutting diet will b gr8 also with bulking diet will b gr8 ur diet is the key factor for cutting or bulkin but in general it will be a good stack but put some winny @ the end

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Tampa,Montreal,Paris
    Posts
    4,186
    It wont be the greatest cycle for cutting but once the water sheds off youll have a lean more defined look

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    cairo/egypt
    Posts
    2,724
    very cool avatar prada

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Tampa,Montreal,Paris
    Posts
    4,186
    Thanks dude.
    You got some freak ass definition in your back! Keep it up

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    94
    Quote Originally Posted by AIZ
    I know there are better "cutting" stacks but I was looking for some opinions on the combination of Eq and prop. Since eq is great to stack with almost anything, especially test, I was thinking that this could be for bulking. However, I know that many use test prop for cutting as it tends cause less sides than E or C. Any thoughts on Eq and prop for cutting?
    Have you used EQ before? Many find it increases appetite, not a good thing when trying to cut.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Glutes & Quads
    Posts
    9,519
    IMO EQ is a waste for a cutting cycle. Reason being that the typical cutter last 12 weeks or so and EQ takes more then half of that time to kick on. Also, as Joop mentioned it does effect hunger as well. I just finished running 600mgs for 3+ months and hunger was through the roof and that doesnt help when trying to create a caloric deficit. I've never been much a fan of EQ, has never really impressed me at all..................

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    488
    Quote Originally Posted by Jayhova16
    IMO EQ is a waste for a cutting cycle. Reason being that the typical cutter last 12 weeks or so and EQ takes more then half of that time to kick on. Also, as Joop mentioned it does effect hunger as well. I just finished running 600mgs for 3+ months and hunger was through the roof and that doesnt help when trying to create a caloric deficit. I've never been much a fan of EQ, has never really impressed me at all..................
    3 months? Damn! I'm running it for 12 weeks and now you got me worried nothing will happen. I'm just looking for 5-10 lean lbs, some vascularity and a hunger increase though... nothing really out there? Only being run for 12 weeks, is that a realistic goal Jayhova?

    Back to the topic...

    As far as EQ goes for a cutter, don't risk it! And when I say don't 'risk' it, I mean the hunger. I'm hardly 4 weeks into a good cycle @ 600mg/week and I think I'm already getting hunger pangs! Vascularity, definition and hardness? Sure. But there are other drugs out there that will do an EQ-like job just without the hunger. Keep reasearchin' bro, and let us know what you decide...

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Glutes & Quads
    Posts
    9,519
    Quote Originally Posted by vein-x
    I'm just looking for 5-10 lean lbs, some vascularity and a hunger increase though... .


    LBM increase, vascularity, Increased hunger. Since these are your goals EQ is perfect for you. I have ran it a couple of times and never longer then 12 weeks. Only reason is that I typically dont run long cycles.

  10. #10
    Tren or masteron would be a better choice to stack with the test prop for a cutter.

    Not a huge fan of EQ myself it has to run at high doses for a long period of time to get the benefits and even then all i got was a few pounds,increased hunger and vascularity WOW. Much better options that give more bang for your buck like tren or even deca.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Glutes & Quads
    Posts
    9,519
    Quote Originally Posted by j martini
    Tren or masteron would be a better choice to stack with the test prop for a cutter.

    Not a huge fan of EQ myself it has to run at high doses for a long period of time to get the benefits and even then all i got was a few pounds,increased hunger and vascularity WOW. Much better options that give more bang for your buck like tren or even deca.

    Agreed 100%

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •