Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: pyramiding vs constant

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    138

    pyramiding vs constant

    I understand the current cycle theory is to take a constant dose throughout. However, since many people get test flu and at the end of the cycle come off depressed is there anybody who has tried starting slow the first 2 weeks and ending off slow the last 2 weeks of a cycle with test. If you are going to end up at 500 per week starting at 200 then 300 then 500 and coming off going from 500 to 300 to 200 to 100. This would not be as drastic to your natty levels when going through pct. THoughts?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    the true north
    Posts
    1,881
    i am not 100% certain, but i dont see how pyramiding down your dose would have an effect of your natural test recovery.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    some where in the USA
    Posts
    1,307
    Quote Originally Posted by vic99
    I understand the current cycle theory is to take a constant dose throughout. However, since many people get test flu and at the end of the cycle come off depressed is there anybody who has tried starting slow the first 2 weeks and ending off slow the last 2 weeks of a cycle with test. If you are going to end up at 500 per week starting at 200 then 300 then 500 and coming off going from 500 to 300 to 200 to 100. This would not be as drastic to your natty levels when going through pct. THoughts?

    Well that has been around for years and I myself have done just that and yes it does help but the reason behind it was more of a pct thing becasue many years ago we did'nt have access to what there is now ... and for me I cant really say one way or the other because before the bike wreck I was on 10 months out of the year and If i rememeber way back when I did 12 weeks on 12 off i did get depressed but that was a metal thing from just being off ..... but with all the advances with Anti' E's and Pct methods to run stright through will have a better overall on but I have done both and to be honest i never seen that much of a difference either way IMO

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    yeah thats me in avvy
    Posts
    5,669
    Thats cause there is no difference my freind...once your HPTA is shut dwon its shut down...weening off your dosage will not kick it back...there's where pct fall into place.I dont believe in tapering up either...I want it in my system quick so i'll front load and get my levels up asap.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,054
    Although tappering off could be debated. I see no need to ramp up the dosage. Start at your max dose and tapper off when you want.


    EDIT** damn bigmax beat me to it.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    yeah thats me in avvy
    Posts
    5,669
    Lol!!!!!

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Bigmax
    Thats cause there is no difference my freind...once your HPTA is shut dwon its shut down...weening off your dosage will not kick it back...there's where pct fall into place.I dont believe in tapering up either...I want it in my system quick so i'll front load and get my levels up asap.
    I agree 110%.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •