As said before on this site and others Ronnie has the super freek look compared to Arnolds more "natural" appearance. Comparing the 2 is like comparing lineman of the 60 and today. Today we have better drugs, training, supplements and knowledge. Neat photo.
If i was a judge still have to give it up to arnold. His body goes together so well. Don't get me wrong ronnie is jacked but doesn't look as well put together as arnold.
Less is more![]()
I tend to disagree, Arnold have no legs comparing to Ronnie.Originally Posted by DSM4Life
Its not about size. Look at arnold definition and then look at ronnies smooth , "huge" legs. Its not about who is bigger.Originally Posted by MrMent1on
well unfortunately Arnold wouldnt finish in the top 15 in todays Olympia, sad but true.
Sure Ronnie has bigger legs than Arnold, but he also has alot bigger gut and waist line.
Arnold FTW. The only guy that comes close to Arnolds presentation, will be Phil Heath once he brings his chest up
'73 Olympia, Arnold at his biggest...I think this is him later on, when he didn't even try as hard....
when i look at ronnie's body,i just cant relate to it.the proportions are ridiculas.most body builders these days are just mass monsters and have no asthetics.your mind tells you its just not right!
Branch Warren had a good beginning sentence in the most recent Muscular Development Magizine, he said, Asethetic is another word for small. and you'll never have a small guy win the SandowOriginally Posted by helium3
The only things that look bigger are ronnies gut and legs!
Originally Posted by MrMent1on
Arnold also didnt have acess to the type of gear ronnie runs
Arnold without a doubt
Ronnie looks like the concrete block before you carve into it. Arnold looks like the carved out finshed product. Both the best in their ERA, just like Ruth-Bonds, Chamberlain-Shaq, etc.....
Truer words have yet to be spoken.Originally Posted by SVTMuscle
ronnie looks more fake then arnold does
From what I understand of the cycles Arnold was taking in his day, it would be something relative to a first timers cycler, or half of it, if that....
~M.A.D.
No Legs? Ronnie's may be larger than Arnolds but Arnolds look way more Symetrical and defined.Originally Posted by MrMent1on
![]()
I like Arnolds look much better, but you cannot compare the two w/ that pic. Arnold looks just as big as Ronnie in the pic minus the waistline and legs, which we all know is not true. Arnolds arms were not as big as Ronnies, and they look bigger in the pic, it's 2 different pics taken from different angles and distances photoshopped to look the same, or comparable. Legs or no legs, pretty big ****ing difference b/ Arnolds size and weight and Ronnies. And for the record, Scwharzenegger was never 240 on stage, I have a friend who witnessed his Olympmia prep personally, and saw him get on the scale during a bet between Ken Waller, the bet was for $50, that Arnold didnt weigh more than 220. He got on the scale and quickly got off it.
Well said!! I agree, Arnie still looks like he has more chest in that pic than Ronnie. But Ronnie's legs look like they have their own zip code.Originally Posted by sooners04
agree with you, I love arnold but comparing the two is not fair. ronnie has the benefit of the work and experience of the greats. if arnold were competing today i belive he would just as awesome but bigger. but as far as the picture gooses ronnie takes it.Originally Posted by MrMent1on
Ronnie Vs. Arnold for u who think ronnie is better then arnold in any way ur out of ur mind
first off u all say if arnold was competing in ronnies day he might be better theres no doubt he would be a beast
but if u put ronnie back in arnolds day he would have no chance on stage
arnie looks better, even though ronnie is bigger
Ron looks like he's pregnant.
But, those are the best abs i've seen on a pregnant chick yet!
I got news for all of you guys, if Arnold competed today looking like he did at his best, I doubt he even place top 20 in the Nationals.
thanks for that breaking news
Arnold Where's Your Legs?
Arnold where's your drugs!Originally Posted by Hellmask
agreed
arnold didnt have access to gear like ronnie does
i've never seen a body compare to arnolds. perfect symmetry. ronnie is great, no doubt, but too bulky. arnold still has that "natural" feel to his body.
The alien embryo that broke outta Ronnie's GH gut ate them. And then it looks like Ronnie ate the alien in return. I wouldn't mind looking like either of them, but I prefer Arnold's more symmetrical look.Originally Posted by Hellmask
I know this has been done a few times but its an oldie and eh moldy that never gets old... every time someone makes a new thread...Originally Posted by Undecided09
Very true, they did not have the technology we have today or the better understanding of synthetic hormones. You could say a first timer but I think some of the doses I hear about are or should be for an all timer...
50mg of prop and 15-30-50mg of dbol ed. 2-3 weeks on 2-3 weeks off, 250mg sos 1-2 Ewk and GH late 70's early 80's... (not read, hear say from an old school personal trainer that has past on RIP)
I still wonder what Arnie ate as a teen... you can not dismis the genetics of the two, which I think is also a factor
Still no one will have a chest like Arnold... no one will ever have that frame and hold his mass that way... It also might be because no one eats, trains and uses the same amount and type of hormones too and has that frame, and has that frame, and has, j/k,,, felt like I said this some where before but like five times...
two different eras, as some one said before.
I know this has been done a few times but its an oldie and eh moldy that never gets old... every time someone makes a new thread...Originally Posted by Undecided09
Very true, they did not have the technology we have today or the better understanding of synthetic hormones. You could say a first timer but I think some of the doses I hear about are or should be for an all timer...
50mg of prop and 15-30-50mg of dbol ed. 2-3 weeks on 2-3 weeks off, 250mg sos 1-2 Ewk and GH late 70's early 80's... (not read, hear say from an old school personal trainer that has past on RIP)
I still wonder what Arnie ate as a teen... you can not dismis the genetics of the two, which I think is also a factor
Still no one will have a chest like Arnold... no one will ever have that frame and hold his mass that way... It also might be because no one eats, trains and uses the same amount and type of hormones too and has that frame, and has that frame, and has, j/k,,, felt like I said this some where before but like five times...
two different eras, as some one said before.
Yep, Arnie's chest was best!
Arnie all the way!!
I think overall ronnie is bigger, his thighs are 2X the size of Arnolds. Arms arent too different. All in all ronnie is bigger but Arnold has a better physique than ronnie. Arnold has a longer leaner chest and torso. I dont know thats like comparing Bruce Li to Jet Li, 2 DIFFERENT eras.
arnold looks like a greek god. ronnie looks disgusting.
dont be fooled...If Arnold had access to the Supps and Drugs of today he would have won 10 more olympias ... further More Arnold took the sport to the next level and Everyone in the sport today Owes him for opening the door to the world ... he will always be the best ... just ask ronnie himselfOriginally Posted by stayinstacked
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)