How could you incorporate bold cyp into a short heavy cycle thats 6wks long? Would you need to go way over a gram?
How could you incorporate bold cyp into a short heavy cycle thats 6wks long? Would you need to go way over a gram?
ROFL are u seroius?
i have ran Eq over 1.2g a week and saw nothing special even in 12 weeks soif u wanna ramp it upto like 5g a week u might see SOMETHING in a short cycle.. LIKE HIGH BP
So what are you say? I mean 12wks for EQ is the normal lenght. I would imagine that at over a gram you would see soemthing. Maybe its just you're crazy high dosing ass lolOriginally Posted by taiboxa
what would you want to get out of it?
no dood i know TONS that run eq .. its one odd compound that is reluctant to give gains no matter wat dose.. its a duration based thing IMO even bold base is krap and gives VERY slow gainsOriginally Posted by briansauras
Ive heard of it giving people vascularity and rediculous pumps in the gym. I also hurt that it putters out around wk 12-13Originally Posted by taiboxa
well if the gains are only noticable around week 8+ and it dies around 12-13.. then its a pretty retarded compound no?Originally Posted by briansauras
whoknows. i guess i wont waste my money on it. ill just add more tren and nppOriginally Posted by taiboxa
![]()
npp is great.. 0 sides and great gainsOriginally Posted by briansauras
Originally Posted by briansauras
I run Eq in my last 3 cycles,it is very good for vascularity,gains are slow but not icredible,and pump,im not sure about that.In overall i like Eq...
LPR.
Originally Posted by briansauras
...agree....i don't recomend Eq for short cycles
LPR.
doesnt work in short cycles, infact it doesnt work in long cycles either.
12 + wks of EQ
I agree with Marcus here. I have ran EQ numerous times and I'm done with this eq crap. Even at 1 gram a week, all I saw was a rise in my RBC count.Originally Posted by marcus300
Damn Right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Originally Posted by marcus300
Originally Posted by marcus300
LOL ok why the bad rap On EQ ....... I have run it many many times and run some cycles with out It ..... But will agree 100% not to even think about EQ in a short cycle .. Now back to the long end of it ...... as for the pumps cant really say when running other compounds ... but I have always gotten a much HARDER LOOK WITH EQ Now keep in mind you need to have devloped mature muscle IMO to apperacite EQ.... and makeing you stronger well cant say that .......... but when i have left EQ out there was A differnce In the over all look But like I said before I have run it with and with out it.....
Allso IMO EQ is very tricky with its gains( meaning dont look for EQ to add size ) but much HARDER LEANER LOOKING and i played with dosages and time on... untill I got the over all effect I wanted ... and I think it has more to do with muscle maturity than anything to rep EQ benifits ......... So I can see why many dont like It ......... BUT I DO
EQ gains are more quality then quantity.you will only get vascular if you are a vascular person to begin with,not everyone is vascular(genetics)(and the increase is from the increase in RBC) if the RBC becomes an issue all one need due is go donate a pint of blood and watch your levels drop.I personally love EQ,would use it more often if the price was right.
and btw I believe any dose over 800mg/week is a waste,you dont need to take that much for full effects
Why use Eq when you can have Tren? Burgers or steak spring to mind!!
-XL
jing jai
ill be using prop, tren, npp and winny. just wondering if eq would be a good idea. i was more interested in the pumps/vascularity if gives u since winny is going to make me hard as a rock.Originally Posted by xtralarg
2 totally different compounds with 2 totally different effects.Originally Posted by xtralarg
im right there w/ya homeskilletOriginally Posted by marcus300
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)