Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: EQ /Test for 20wks?

  1. #1

    EQ /Test for 20wks?

    What do you think about 20 weeks on Test @ 300mg PW and EQ @ 600mg PW? Would HCG be necessary mid-cycle? Would blood pressure be a problem? Would there still be very little bloat given the amount of test for that long? Thanks for the input!

    I have done three cycles in the past including various combinations of test, tren, eq, and t3. I am 22, 5'8, 210lbs. @ 15%bf. I will be cutting over the next three months naturally. I plan to be sub-10% when I start the cycle.

    My last experience on AAS was 10wks. of Test @ 500PW and EQ @ 400PW. I enjoyed it very much and had very little sides. I'm thinking of this cycle now because I would like to try a long cycle with little sides. I would prefer Primo, but can't afford it. Originally, I was just thinking of running enough test to replace my natural test once HTPA is inhibited. Since my source carries test @ 300mg/ml, I figured I would just run it @ 1ml per week.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tri-state
    Posts
    97

    keep hcg on hand

    definitely hcg post cycle before the pct. keep it around if you shrink do it for a few weeks in the middle. and at the end. that is one theory i heard.

    than the other see,ms to be doing 250iu's every third day during the cycle toprevent shrickage altogether.

    i will not use more than 5-600 mg's of test a week, so i haven't had a problem the last few cycles.

    pattyd

  3. #3
    Thanks for the input! How long have you run those cycles with 5-600mg of test? have you run any with less test, closer to 300mg? And if so, did you have any water retention?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    the dirty
    Posts
    907
    i do 20 week cycles and never need hcg as my balls NEVER shrink. the only time i had shrinkage was from deca. and my pct and recovery are always easy and quick.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Bubba Army
    Posts
    5,824
    im actually starting test 300mg/wk with eq 400mg/wk. we'll see how it goes. im planning on using hcg throughout.

  6. #6
    HCG throughout? That seems like way too long to me. I thought that HCG could be overdone and do more harm than good.

    Timtim- Do you use test on those cycles? If so, at what doses? What I'm really concerned about is too much water retention b/c this is a lean bulker. Also, I don't want to be taking 17aas (nolva) for 20 weeks.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    255
    i'm also thinking a similar low dose cycle like this for the summer months.. like test 300/eq500/wk....

    i was gonna throw in 6weeks of var to get the long ester party started though

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    367
    why would you want to do less test ew then eq? if bloat is your concern just use nova or l-dex you want have to worry about bloat. Also if you are cutting before you start I can only assume you will be trying to add weight when you start, therefore I would invite the water you may hold if I were you.It certainly wont hurt you in anyway.

  9. #9
    Well, I'm going for a lean bulker. Remember this initially was a test-free cycle, with just enough to replace natural test during inhibition. I do not see the point of being bloated when you'll lose it post-cycle anyways. I realize that water retention increases strength which may translate into slighlty more muscle over the length of a cycle, but IMO it's not worth it. Also, I know that the human body builds resistance to any drug and when I'm 40 I don't want to have to use extreme amounts of test just to have the effect of the little amount of natural test I had when I was 20. As for nolva or dex, again, I don't want to spend 20 weeks on 17aas.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    255
    I share your same notion. I am an endo and i blaot off of test very easily. Even with a proper AI. When I run a similar cycle my 300mg/wk test will be in there soley as a sex hormone replacement to insure a healthy, functioning sex drive.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    3,030
    I've done long cycles and found the results started tapering off between weeks 12-14. That long cycle also shut me down hard and it took me damn near 6 months to fully recover

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Den sitta på huk ställ
    Posts
    3,476
    Quote Originally Posted by chris3737zz
    As for nolva or dex, again, I don't want to spend 20 weeks on 17aas.
    Nolva and/or adex are not 17aa steroids...they are not even steroids to begin with...I'd educate myself on that issue if I was you.

    -ShrpSkn

  13. #13
    Obviously they are not steroids. 17-alpha-alkylation is a structural alteration that allows a medication to withstand degradation in the liver and makes them orally available. As such, it is possible for non-steroids to be 17aa. I have been told, although I have not actually read any articles saying so, that nolva is 17aa to make it orally available.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Your mom's crib
    Posts
    53
    Sounds like a pretty long cycle to me. Interested to see how it turns out.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Long Freaken Island
    Posts
    1,256
    conventional wisdom says you should run test at a higher dose than EQ, Am I wrong?

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    some where in the USA
    Posts
    1,307
    Quote Originally Posted by shrpskn
    Nolva and/or adex are not 17aa steroids...they are not even steroids to begin with...I'd educate myself on that issue if I was you.

    -ShrpSkn

    Amen ... I think more research is needed if One thinks Adex and nolva are a 17aa.... So my advise would be the same bro please research .. much much more

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Den sitta på huk ställ
    Posts
    3,476
    Quote Originally Posted by chris3737zz
    Obviously they are not steroids. 17-alpha-alkylation is a structural alteration that allows a medication to withstand degradation in the liver and makes them orally available. As such, it is possible for non-steroids to be 17aa. I have been told, although I have not actually read any articles saying so, that nolva is 17aa to make it orally available.
    So would you say that when I take orally applicable ibuprofen for a headache, that it is 17aa just because it's an oral?

    Whoever told you that nolva is 17aa is seriously wrong.

    I see you've been a member here since 2002...you should know something like this by now...at least I'd like to think so.

    -Shrpskn
    Last edited by shrpskn; 11-06-2006 at 11:15 AM.

  18. #18
    You should learn how to read before you post. I did not say that because nolva is oral that it is 17aa. And yes, ibuprofen COULD be structured in such a manner as to make it 17aa. I know very much about AAS and the like. I did hear that nolva is 17aa and I did not research it further by looking to medical journals. I would be curious to see how many medical articles you have read through as opposed to taking board members' words on face.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Pissing on saluu
    Posts
    5,415
    First, I did one long cycle... I liked it. good doses though I would add some tren in there somewhere. I would hit hcg in the middle at 1500-2500 iu every fourth day for 3-4 injections then wait until the end for 1000iu ed for 10 days leading into clomid(pct).

    Nolva is not 17aa.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •