i dont really hear too much about omnadren on this site. alot people seem to favor sustanon. i think sus and omna's are very similiar, and im jus wondering what people opinions are the two. which do you prefer?
i dont really hear too much about omnadren on this site. alot people seem to favor sustanon. i think sus and omna's are very similiar, and im jus wondering what people opinions are the two. which do you prefer?
omnadren for $$$$ reasons
that's why im askin. is it just as good as sus? i've never tried omna's but might for my next cycle. anyone ever use both omna's and sus and find a big difference between the two?Originally Posted by Venomous Nemisis
I think omna and sus are the same now. Didn't they change omna?
A good brand sustanon is superior to omnadren.
Omnadren is cheap and IMO some batches are underdosed.
I still happily used it during my last cycle though
As long as you get legit Omna's...they are the "exact" same as Sust's.....but much cheaper and a little less painful for some reason....my personal experience.
Omna's are a good choice if you are in the market for test blends. I think you get more for less with these.
My$.02
Dizz
ya they changed the esters to the same as Sust'sOriginally Posted by MartyMcFly
ah i didnt know this. ya learn somethin knew everyday.Originally Posted by Dizz28
Both are pretty much the same. Just depends on brands and so forth. The esters are now the same, and you shouldn't see much difference with either one, except one (omna) you'll just notice a difference when it comes down to your pocket.
Ive run both a few times. Sust was fine for me but with the omnadren the sides were wicked. It worked but I hated the sides. And it seemed like nothing slowed them down and they came on alot quicker then any other form of test I have ever taken. That's probably the reason there are 40 unused amps sitting taking up space somewhere.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)