Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Getting Rid of Gyno-fat from test/EQ

  1. #1

    Getting Rid of Gyno-fat from test/EQ

    I did a cycle of test E and EQ, but ran letro the whole time, so I never really had puffy or painful nipples, but I now have an area of fat on my chest that just wont go away with cutting like the fat on my stomach did. I guess its like semi-gyno as I cant tell if its simply fat or not. I am now halfway through an epi cycle hoping this will get rid of it and so far its not doing anything.

    I did have very bad prolactin gyno during cycle and still kind of do.. (I dont know why i got it tho it didnt take any deca). I tried 500mcgs of caber a day, then tried pergolide myselate which i think started to work but i got heart pain and quit it.

    But yea what i need is advice on how to get rid of this as i have a few ideas:

    1. Run letro at 2.5+mg for the rest of my epi cycle, then go into Toremifene post cycle therapy with aromasin. However i will have to deal with messing up already bad joints and killing my sex drive.

    2. Start aromasin 25mg now with the epi and continue the aromasin into my toremifene post cycle therapy.

    3. Anyone have any better ideas?

    As of right now im taking 150mcg T4 with 30mg epi doing cardio 5 days a week. About to start igf.

    thanks

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Whereville
    Posts
    767
    post some pics will help us tell if u can cut that out with an extensive work or ...with an expensive surgery. By the way, you should think of incoporating Cabergoline and Bromocriptine in your cycle, it may help, I'm not really sure but u need to research this before u take my word for it. Good luck
    Last edited by S431M7; 05-24-2007 at 04:25 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,112
    Bromo, for an Eq-test cycle.
    None of these compounds have progestantic abilities, so no need for that bro.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by VanTheMan
    Bromo, for an Eq-test cycle.
    None of these compounds have progestantic abilities, so no need for that bro.
    the caber and bromo is for prolactin issues not progestin im pretty sure. And i know that test and Eq arent supposed to cause prolactin issues, but trust me... i had a prolactin issue thers no question there..

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Mid west
    Posts
    3,366
    Quote Originally Posted by ItalianStalion9
    the caber and bromo is for prolactin issues not progestin im pretty sure. And i know that test and Eq arent supposed to cause prolactin issues, but trust me... i had a prolactin issue thers no question there..
    Were you lactating?

  6. #6
    yeah i was, so it dont know where the prolactin came from or if thats whats keeping the "gyno fat" from leaving. i may give cabergoline another try

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    2,222
    You are probaly prone to storing fat in your lower chest area, and with futher cycling it will most likely get worse.

    Imo letro could shrink the lump type gyno, but not the fatty type, breast-developent.

    I would have liposuction done, which will remove the fat-cells around your lower chest for good.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    SOUTH
    Posts
    2,318
    I would run a low dose of letro, and do the cabergoline worked for me ... you dont have to be running tren/deca to get prog gyno

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by james21
    I would run a low dose of letro, and do the cabergoline worked for me ... you dont have to be running tren/deca to get prog gyno
    The low doese letro and caber worked for getting rid of some fatty gyno after you already had it? or just prevented further growth?

    thanks

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •