Well here's what happened:
http://forums.steroid.com/showthread.php?t=289470
Ive been on 3 IU a day of Jintropin. Into week 12 now. The injury is close to healed. I saw a sports injury specialist this week. The guy looked at the ultrasound images and the X-ray but thought that the injury had healed further in the twenty days between the ultrasound and my appointment with him. He reckoned the injury is about 95 percent healed.
This is an injury that had not healed natty for about 6 months before I started with GH.
So here are a few trips for the bros with a tendon injury:
Don't make the mistake I made in waiting for 6 months before using your own means of fixing the injury. As soon as you realise you have a tendon injury, get GH or IGF-1 right away (assuming you are not diabetic and do not have other problems which would disqualify usage). And here's the interesting bit: the doc I spoke to said that if the injury hadn't healed he would have tried soundwave therapy, cortisone shots and a lot of other pointless treatment which in reality does nothing to speed recovery.
Here's the astonishing fact: my own method (of simply injecting 3 IU a day of GH) was a superior method of healing a tendon injury than anything that would have been applied and used by a Sports Injury specialist with 10 years' experience. This raises the question: Why is the medical profession not using GH for healing joint and tendon injuries when GH has been around for more than twenty years and is well known for speeding up recovery? It is quite astonishing.
I do think that the injury could have been healed in 4 weeks flat if instead of using GH I had used IGF-1. This was a mistake in hindsight. But GH wasn't a waste - my bodyfat levels have dropped incredibly, skintone has improved and the bloat on my face (a remnant of the last deca cycle) is gone. So it wasn't a waste. But I guess the point is, if you only want to use GH for healing tendons, use IGF-1 instead. It would be cheaper and would work a lot faster.
Comments invited.