I haven't seriously supplemented with Creatine in over a year, but today I picked up some old school 100% Creatine Monohydrate. ( I am on a strict budget until next month lol) There is a little creatine in my pre workout NO2 drink, but not alot beacuse I take he minimum dosage. (also for budget reasons) Anyways I have heard so much about this Creatine Ethyl Ester (CE2), Creatine Ether Ester Malate, CE2 Platinum, Creatine Monohydrate, Creatine Gluconate, etc. Each of these boasts to be the best and better than the rest, and though I don't doubt the science behind them, I know GNC employees who have told me they are all pretty much the same thing with little difference, and I know some long time bodybuilders that supplemented with the original Monohydrate when it first came out and have used the newest stuff and they say besides conviencince there isnt much difference if you load/cycle monohydrate properly. What do you think?