I haven't been able to find a real answer on this. But should test be ran longer than EQ like most do for Deca/Tren? (I know its not a 19-nor, just wondered if it would need to be ran shorter than test).
I haven't been able to find a real answer on this. But should test be ran longer than EQ like most do for Deca/Tren? (I know its not a 19-nor, just wondered if it would need to be ran shorter than test).
EQ has a relatively long half-life even compared to the commonly used long estered tests like enanthate and cypionate, so yes, it would be a good idea to come off it before the test...The dosage of the test, whether used at replacement dosages or as a key compound of the cycle, is wholly a different matter
exactly insane. just make sure that your test dosage is 25% higher than eq . eq does not really work till week 6, i am taking 400 mgs a week and i am on a 20 week cycle it makes you very hard
Last edited by elvis1280; 01-09-2008 at 12:50 AM.
Test 25% higher than EQ? so far all the info I ve come across pretty much put Test E at 500 and Eq at 600 - runnin Test 2weeks past Eq - as the ideal ... just my 2pennies in the pot
agree ^^^^
So I should run for example:
1-12: EQ 400mg
1-16: Test Prop 700mg (or since it is prop would 525 suffice)
or
1-12: EQ 600mg
1-14: Test E 750mg
am currently in week 9 of 16weeks Test E at 500 and 14 weeks EQ which I've just bumped up from 400 to 600 since after 8 weeks at 400 I didn't see much of it. All my research as well as advice I ve been given from the more senior guys on here suggests that EQ should ideally be run no less than 14weeks due to it being very mild and takin quite a while to kick in. Like said - just relayin info here ... am on my first with EQ myself
I have read 600mgs is the dose to go with. I'll probably do 600mgs with 750mgs of test e. And front load the EQ the first week.
Last edited by KeepingItBalanced; 01-07-2008 at 08:42 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)