Short cycles just as effective for people who dont "cruise"?

[dsw222]

xxxx

[Johny-too-small]

Short cycles are under 6 weeks. 8 week cycles on short-esters are more common than seeing a fat chick.

[Njord]

I've been reading a lot of the posts on here and other boards about long cycles vs short cycles. It seems that a lot of the people who prefer short cycles are going to low dose cruising between those short cycles, or are just on permanent HRT. Has anyone had good experience running something along the lines of prop/tren ace for 8 weeks or so, and then done PCT instead of going back to HRT? I'm curious as to how much easier the recovery would be, and if more of the gains would be cemented.

So far, I have only run 12-16 week cycles with long esters throughout, and short esters as kickstarts. I am considering trying out a short ester cycle for 8-10 weeks, so any info would be appreciated! Thanks

I haven't seem any post on here where people do short cycles and cruise between them. There are plenty of people on here that are proponents of short cycles, and if you do a search, I'm sure you'll find some post on it.
I wouldn't really classify 8-10 week cycles as short neither, more on the range of medium.

[facile]

Short cycles are under 6 weeks. 8 week cycles on short-esters are more common than seeing a fat chick.

[dsw222]

xxxx

[Njord]

So you still think that in general the 6 weekers are worth it, gains-wise?

The reason i'm skeptical is because that's only approx 6 workouts for each major muscle group, and it seems like such a short time to see results.

I guess i'm just used to waiting a while to seeing results with the long esters....

I kinda agree with you, I'm a little skeptical myself. But there have been plenty of posts with people getting good gains on short cycles. We might just have to try it ourselves to find out.

[PT]

i have had great results with 6-7 week cycles. my last one i did npp, d-bol and test suspension and loved it. if you do a 10 week cycle and it takes 5 weeks for the gear to kick in then thats really only 5 workouts per muscle group to

[facile]

So you still think that in general the 6 weekers are worth it, gains-wise?

The reason i'm skeptical is because that's only approx 6 workouts for each major muscle group, and it seems like such a short time to see results.

I guess i'm just used to waiting a while to seeing results with the long esters....

I have read about foks doing 4 week cycles, I agree if you hit a muscle group only once a week, not many workout "on".

If you give a try please keep track of your stats and post your experience.

[Dog-Slime]

I gained around 10-11 lbs on a 5 week cycle of h-drol @ 75mgs ED. I gained 8-9lbs (Plus got sick during cycle, would have gained more) on a 30 day cycle of t-bol @ 50mgs ED. Only lost two or so pounds each pct, which I believe to have been glycogen. I am now a firm believer that great gains can be made in a short amount of time. I have only done a handful of cycles tho and seem to respond better than most to AAS.