
Originally Posted by
BrokenBricks
I know when I am looking for an opinion on what is or is not nonsense, I turn to people who cannot spell the word "nonsense". (Actual example of condescension Jimmy)
The thermic effect of food is related to the amount and type of food consumed, not the time it is consumed. Though I am happy to be corrected.
Here is a hypothesis. You tend to see people who eat frequent small meals be in better shape because of all of the modifications to lifestyle and diet, eating frequent small meals is one of the most difficult. Those who are successful in making that lifestyle change are already among the most dedicated and are likely *also* better at all of the other myriad things which popular bodybuilding theory claims (with good reason) are essential for fitness.
Simply comparing random people you know who eat small meals with those who don't is a hopelessly confounded way of knowing if it actually helps. You must control for *all* differences and isolate meal frequency from other confounding factors like content, amount, frequency of workouts and so on.
For my part I will continue to eat frequent small meals. Though I will read the studies linked and reevaluate soon.
"I GUARANTEE YOU THERE ARE MANY MANY MORE SUPPORTING THE BENEFITS OF MULTIPLE SMALL MEALS.... " Yes, because clearly the *number* of studies is what counts, not the quality. What does some second rate journal like Nature think it is doing by questioning your broknowledge.