Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: No advantage of eating frequent meals for keeping metabolism high.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,690

    No advantage of eating frequent meals for keeping metabolism high.

    I always thought eating more frequent kept your metabolism higher but according to some scientific studies it doesn't do anything for your metabolism.

    http://journals.cambridge.org/action...ine&aid=879792

    http://www.nature.com/ijo/journal/v2.../0801572a.html

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    michigan
    Posts
    753
    nonsense.

  3. #3
    amcon's Avatar
    amcon is offline physical pain is temporary. It may last a minute, or an hour, or a day, or a year, but eventually it will subside... The pain of quiting will lasts forever!!
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    in the freaking cold
    Posts
    3,846
    Quote Originally Posted by dece870717 View Post
    I always thought eating more frequent kept your metabolism higher but according to some scientific studies it doesn't do anything for your metabolism.

    http://journals.cambridge.org/action...ine&aid=879792

    http://www.nature.com/ijo/journal/v2.../0801572a.html
    nonsence... the guys who did the study were prob fat and jealous -

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,271
    I think if you ate very clean meals and didn't eat as frequent say 3x a day, i'm sure it'd work ok, you could maybe add mass, but SO MANY have shown studies (not to mention living proof) of what eating frequent meals does so man you have to call this nonsence

  5. #5
    jimmyinkedup's Avatar
    jimmyinkedup is offline Disappointment* Known SCAMMER - Do Not Trust *
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Scamming my brothers
    Posts
    11,285
    yeah who knows re metabolism ...it makes sense that frequent meals would keep it high ..even if just from energy expenditure of digestion ...but who knows. Many theorize that 6 meals + / day are unnecessary as well. Ill stick with my 6 meals ...if for no other reason than steady, assured availability of. nutrients...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,983
    You don't have to look that far to find fat skinny guys that eat twice a day.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    GTA
    Posts
    14,261
    There are many studies that sugest frequent meals are superior for many reasons.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Tryin to get Abs
    Posts
    3,353
    Wow Thats Sum BS and u also get a thermic effect from eating frequently as well

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Gym and the Kitchen
    Posts
    684
    Did you try comparing the amount of studies you found supporting your statement and those that were contradictory? I GUARANTEE YOU THERE ARE MANY MANY MORE SUPPORTING THE BENEFITS OF MULTIPLE SMALL MEALS....

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    In The Kitchen :)
    Posts
    3,480
    Bullshit, it works without having to do cardio.

  11. #11
    I know when I am looking for an opinion on what is or is not nonsense, I turn to people who cannot spell the word "nonsense". (Actual example of condescension Jimmy)

    The thermic effect of food is related to the amount and type of food consumed, not the time it is consumed. Though I am happy to be corrected.

    Here is a hypothesis. You tend to see people who eat frequent small meals be in better shape because of all of the modifications to lifestyle and diet, eating frequent small meals is one of the most difficult. Those who are successful in making that lifestyle change are already among the most dedicated and are likely *also* better at all of the other myriad things which popular bodybuilding theory claims (with good reason) are essential for fitness.

    Simply comparing random people you know who eat small meals with those who don't is a hopelessly confounded way of knowing if it actually helps. You must control for *all* differences and isolate meal frequency from other confounding factors like content, amount, frequency of workouts and so on.

    For my part I will continue to eat frequent small meals. Though I will read the studies linked and reevaluate soon.

    "I GUARANTEE YOU THERE ARE MANY MANY MORE SUPPORTING THE BENEFITS OF MULTIPLE SMALL MEALS.... " Yes, because clearly the *number* of studies is what counts, not the quality. What does some second rate journal like Nature think it is doing by questioning your broknowledge.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    ShredVille
    Posts
    12,572
    Quote Originally Posted by BrokenBricks View Post
    I know when I am looking for an opinion on what is or is not nonsense, I turn to people who cannot spell the word "nonsense". (Actual example of condescension Jimmy)

    The thermic effect of food is related to the amount and type of food consumed, not the time it is consumed. Though I am happy to be corrected.

    Here is a hypothesis. You tend to see people who eat frequent small meals be in better shape because of all of the modifications to lifestyle and diet, eating frequent small meals is one of the most difficult. Those who are successful in making that lifestyle change are already among the most dedicated and are likely *also* better at all of the other myriad things which popular bodybuilding theory claims (with good reason) are essential for fitness.

    Simply comparing random people you know who eat small meals with those who don't is a hopelessly confounded way of knowing if it actually helps. You must control for *all* differences and isolate meal frequency from other confounding factors like content, amount, frequency of workouts and so on.

    For my part I will continue to eat frequent small meals. Though I will read the studies linked and reevaluate soon.

    "I GUARANTEE YOU THERE ARE MANY MANY MORE SUPPORTING THE BENEFITS OF MULTIPLE SMALL MEALS.... " Yes, because clearly the *number* of studies is what counts, not the quality. What does some second rate journal like Nature think it is doing by questioning your broknowledge.

    Yeah If I got one of my papers in Nature, I would chalk that up to a major disappointment....
    Last edited by MuscleScience; 01-31-2009 at 11:14 AM.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    ShredVille
    Posts
    12,572
    I will say that there is only two ways that and individual can stimulate metabolism in a long term sense. One is to exercise and another is to eat. Of course you can take diet pills or get really pissed off, I am referring to meaningful long term changes in metabolic expenditure throughout the day.

  14. #14
    I had a guy this week with Graves disease. Guy lost 40 lb in 3 months, not bad. He got atrial fibrillation because his T3 level was about 100 times normal and it damaged his heart.

    It was a great case though.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    30,963
    Just about every meal i sweat afterwards, kind of annoying.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    ShredVille
    Posts
    12,572
    Quote Originally Posted by BrokenBricks View Post
    I had a guy this week with Graves disease. Guy lost 40 lb in 3 months, not bad. He got atrial fibrillation because his T3 level was about 100 times normal and it damaged his heart.

    It was a great case though.
    I guess thats another way to stimulate metabolism. I have worked with a few people with non pharmacological induced Graves, I guess more correctly they had no thyroid at that point....

  17. #17
    jimmyinkedup's Avatar
    jimmyinkedup is offline Disappointment* Known SCAMMER - Do Not Trust *
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Scamming my brothers
    Posts
    11,285
    Quote Originally Posted by BrokenBricks View Post
    I know when I am looking for an opinion on what is or is not nonsense, I turn to people who cannot spell the word "nonsense". (Actual example of condescension Jimmy)
    *L* that (the bold above) is funny ....

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,271
    Quote Originally Posted by BrokenBricks View Post
    I know when I am looking for an opinion on what is or is not nonsense, I turn to people who cannot spell the word "nonsense". (Actual example of condescension Jimmy)

    It must be nice to be so smart/humble. Thanks for the correction along with the rude comment.

    I wish that you didn't have to eat 6 meals a day as it is a much harder lifestyle. I am around 3200 a day and sometimes I almost puke getting all my meals in. I can't wait till i'm ready to cut so I won't have to eat as much.
    Last edited by xnotoriousx; 02-01-2009 at 06:53 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •