Just had my bloods in and my test level is only 1500ng/dl!? this is on 500mg UGL Test-E that I have been running for 6+ months.
My natty test is about 350ng/dl so it's 4.5 times that but 1500ng/dl seems low for 500mg? what do you guys think?![]()
Just had my bloods in and my test level is only 1500ng/dl!? this is on 500mg UGL Test-E that I have been running for 6+ months.
My natty test is about 350ng/dl so it's 4.5 times that but 1500ng/dl seems low for 500mg? what do you guys think?![]()
yup,, way low,, should be around 5 to 7k,, 6months??
guess you been runnin bad gear for awhile my friend.
UK huh? pm the brand
Thanks Chuck, could I just be a poor oxidiser? i.e some guys on HRT need 400mg a week to get into the 800-900's ng/dl
I'd try to get 4 weeks worth of pharmaceutical grade and use that for 4 weeks and get a blood test again to see if your UGL gear is really underdosed or if it could possibly be other things causing it.
Yes I was going to drop to 250mg a week and get it tested in 4 weeks as it "might" be the labs maximum range is 1500 ng/dl if not i'll try the pharma...
2x a week...
However guys, if some people need 200-250mg Per week on HRT to put them at 700-900 wouldent that make my 500mg spot on i.e 1500...
dont forget to account for the ester weight and the fact that your own natty test is suppressed and it is UGL.
Like was said,
*ester weight
*It's UGL so likely under dosed some
*Everyone absorbs test differently
100-200mgs a week is the norm for getting TRT patients within normal test ranges. This is with pharm grade that is exactly measured. 1500ng/dl is higher than the normal high range. I would just up my dose to 750mgs if it is under dosed.
Also, having naturally low testosterone has no baring on how well you respond to synthetic testosterone.
This is just my theory, but pharmaceutical's get the highest quality raw materials to develop their steroids.
While UGL's get their raws from sketchy Chinese factories that have no indication of product quality control and sometimes are contaminated whereas pharmaceutical companies everything must be exact to a science.
I don't know if thats right or not, but thats what I was thinking in response to your answer.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)