I'm a long time reader, some time poster. One question I have never really been able to get answered is at what point a muscle has been stimulated enough to grow. Now, I've read most of the stickies many times over and read countless other posts on the best workout(s) guaranteed to increase muscle mass. But I have never seen a definitive answer as to when exactly that sweet spot has been reached.
Cardio, for instance, seems to have upper and lower limits(moderate intensity assumed). Five minutes on a treadmill will probably do next to nothing for you. I've also read that any cardio over 45-60 minutes is of no additional benefit either. So the sweet spot seems to be in the middle. Does the same logic apply to gaining muscle?
When I think of building muscle, making bread seem analogous. Yeast being the muscle and water being the stimulation. Water too cold will not activate the yeast. Water too hot will kill it. Water at the right temperature results in yeast activation and the dough rises. There is also a delay between stimulation(adding water) and result(activation/rising). It seems to me muscle works the same way.
But how much stimulation is "enough" and how much is too much? I've heard both exercising to failure is good or it's bad. I've seen guys in the gym who spend an hour or more focusing on one body part. I've also read books like Pete Sisco's on static holds(extremely heavy weight, held for 5 seconds). Is the trigger for growth really an amount of weight or time?
Is it possible to know when a certain muscle has received enough stimulation to grow? Does continued stimulation past that point equate to greater gains? Or, is it simply wasted energy? Could too much at one time be detrimental?