
Originally Posted by
eliteforce
I think your underestimating the inherent problems of the US domestic auto industry, those foreign companies are not going bankrupt; they may have borrowed money but they are not bankrupt; do you think anyone at the Wall Street Journal, Financial Times, Bloomberg, any leading economist- would agree with you that the financial condition of Toyota, Honda, Porche/VW, Diamler is similar to GM or Chrysler?
All companies with their hand to their respective gvmts.
The American makes are still having problems with reliability- alot of basic stuff-little platic things breaking off, the antena breaking, gaskits breaking and leaks, aircon compressors failure, service, service.. (stuff usually covered by warranty but costs absorbed by GM and Chrysler) then there's the crappy ac delco radio, the swishy power steering , the bad gas milage, the bulkiness , few compact models and bad ones at that.. the NYtimes article you just posted shows that american companies are nowhere near the Japanese in reliability rankings.
That perception only exists in the public's mind. What you say about waranty claims simply isn't true. There are no aircon compressor failures, raido's they put in today in gm cars will blow your ear drums, gaskit leaks (every car company has some, americans have no higher instances), antena breaking (what?, maybe if you run into a tree branch), plastic things breaking (be a little less specific), swishy power stearing (maybe in the 1980's, but it was concidered pimp to have a little play in the wheel back then).
The laws of thermodynamics still are equal in a Japanese engine. Weight, drag coefficent, and horespower not country of orgin matter. If you drive a tin box with 100hp, you get better milage. The larger Japanese models are equal in fuel economy. Unless you do what ford is doing by offering direct injection coming this year, there are no efficency superiorities in a Japanese engine.
Nowhere near? They are a few slots down the list...but that means they break how much more often?
The Japanese totally beat the Americans in the hybrid market, Japan got the models out there first and they were decent albeit expensive.. what did the American companies do, they spent their time reinventing long dead 70's models like the Camero and Charger.. big expensive models that can't make any real money.
The hybrid market is a market that shouldn't exist. A PR bonanza for the jap companies that they cashed in on. It was a legal mandate by the US gov that they develop them. A hybid power train has no practical applications for the enviroment, or cost vs fuel consumption.
Plug in hybids may prove better. A Prius is a $15k car sold for 30 with more ecological impact then a conventional.
but one thing the media never talks about is these Japanese and German companies have an inherent advantage since those countries provide health care-those car companies don't have to worry about it when American companies get bogged down with providing that.
Gvmt healthcare still has to be deducted from their paycheck and from the taxable profits of the corperations and small businesses. It isn't free healthcare. There is a difference between providing benifits and becoming owned by the unions...the unions took too much. Toyota won't even let union reps in the factories.