I did a search and found a few differences, but was wondering if anyone had any 'real life' comparisons between the two. I.e. - better results, no results, etc.
Thanks
I did a search and found a few differences, but was wondering if anyone had any 'real life' comparisons between the two. I.e. - better results, no results, etc.
Thanks
I like both quite honestly, but I think Micronized Creatine Monohydrate by AST is by far the best creatine product on the market and it's phenomenally priced. I take it with 3 grams of citrulline malate every day and have gotten the best results of any creatine I've ever purchased.
If you add Beta Alanine to that mix i PROMISE you will love it. I am surprised more people don't talk more about it. It works EXACTLY as advertised and is as cheap as creatine. Soon Creatine Mono/Beta Alanine will be the standard as CE has been for the past 5 years
AST creatine...good stuff. I pulled this from my FAQ:
Creatine Monohydrate (CM) vs Kre-alkalyn:
Kre-alkalyn is marketed as a pH stable version of creatine monohydrate. The logic behind this is that none of it will convert to creatinine when ingested and while passing through the stomach and intestines, and will only convert after its being used up as a fuel sorce in the form of creatine phosphate. Well here's the problem with that claim, plain old creatine monohydrate is already 99% stable in stomach acid! Also the only studies that exist that show that it is a worth while product are ones marketed by the company, effectively making those null and void since they arn't an accredited institution for creating plausible data and arn't peer reviewed studies.
thanks guys. I have a follow-up question that i just posted in the Creatine faq section to keep all creatine topics together. I think it is a unique question.
Thanks.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)