Deca Or EQ?

[Rabid Pit Bull]

Stats:

Age:25
Height:5'8
Weight:197 Pounds
BF%:Not sure but likely around 13-14%
Training Time:5 1/2 years
Previous Cycles: 1(Test E, DBol)

Well, I was all set on a Test/Deca cycle this summer, but now after researching more on EQ i am torn. I plan on running a longer cycle, which fits with EQ very well, and I am seeing that it is very good for hardening up and vascularity, both of which I desire. I had decided on Deca previously as its a strong bulker, but I don't know if running it for 14 weeks would be overkill and a waste,

I have not run either Deca ir EQ.

Cycles would be as follows:

Test E: WK 1-16 500MG
Deca: WK 1-14 400mg

or

Test E: WK 1-18 500MG
EQ WK 1-16 600MG.

Contributing factors:

I want to keep bloat low.

Also, maybe related to bloat, I have some asshole at work that keeps bringing up steroids and saying thats the only reason I am big, etc etc. I try not to care but witht he general attitude these days towards users I wish to remain anonymous about my use. I deny deny deny of course, but bloating up with 15 pounds of water weight in 2 weeks thanks to deca might give this clown some more ammo to keep talking shit. The slower gains of EQ may be less noticable in the short term.

Hope all this made sense, what are your opinions?

[AlphaMaleDawg]

EQ isn't going to produce much mass gains. Some people say it is a wate, while others like it. I am pretty sure almost everyone will tell you to choose deca and to use an AI if you are concerned about bloat