trust a member?

[kinoplay1]

actually are law enforcement allowed to entrap you?

[calgarian]

keep asking this question and u wont be able to login..........

[kinoplay1]

it's definately hypothetical, haha

[calgarian]

it's definately hypothetical, haha

sure it is and I am a Virgin

[OH REALLY]

sure it is and I am a Virgin

so wait your a Virgin

[calgarian]

so wait your a Virgin

every morning......then over night is changes then I am virgin again in the morning.....if i dont get laid in 6 hrs I become virgin.

[kinoplay1]

i should delete this thread is what saying, i don't want kicked

[sarasotafloridabrian]

Can't ask that. READ THE RULES

[energizer bunny]

just edit your question

[kinoplay1]

thank's man

[Nooomoto]

Don't do business with forum members, and then you don't have to worry about legal problems. Simple.

[kinoplay1]

yeah i know it's better to have a source through the gym if you have that conveniance i lost my source, haha

[Bossman]

yeah i know it's better to have a source through the gym if you have that conveniance i lost my source, haha

My experience is gym sources blow! We have guys trying to sell unmarked 10cc vials five times the price of what a good UGL offers them for.

[awesome1]

My experience is gym sources blow! We have guys trying to sell unmarked 10cc vials five times the price of what a good UGL offers them for.

My experience is that most of the gear users in the gym dont really know what they are doing and just pop "D BALLZ" or inject deca. Do you get your UGL stuff from online or in person?

[Bossman]

My experience is that most of the gear users in the gym dont really know what they are doing and just pop "D BALLZ" or inject deca. Do you get your UGL stuff from online or in person?

I see the same thing. Absolutely no knowledge base of cycling or PCT. Gym guys just take what they can get.

I've never bought from a gym source......Im my own source.

[calgarian]

I see the same thing. Absolutely no knowledge base of cycling or PCT. Gym guys just take what they can get.

I've never bought from a gym source......Im my own source.

Reported !

[Hard.On]

I see the same thing. Absolutely no knowledge base of cycling or PCT. Gym guys just take what they can get.

I've never bought from a gym source......Im my own source.

now i know who to ask

[sarasotafloridabrian]

Talking about your Avatar. Said it was one of your bitches
LMAO, yeah, yeah yeah, I hear ya!

[calgarian]

Talking about your Avatar. Said it was one of your bitches
LMAO, yeah, yeah yeah, I hear ya!

i am tired of ppl asking me abt it....but i have cpl that are little bigger then her. in cup size of course they are fake but who cares

[stack_it]

i am tired of ppl asking me abt it....but i have cpl that are little bigger then her. in cup size of course they are fake but who cares

I lol'd before you clarified you meant cup size

[calgarian]

I lol'd before you clarified you meant cup size

always have to think if DSM stop by so need to cover my butt

[sarasotafloridabrian]

i am tired of ppl asking me abt it....but i have cpl that are little bigger then her. in cup size of course they are fake but who cares

Somehow I think you like the attention.
I agree, who cares if they are fake. So long as she lets you play

[calgarian]

Somehow I think you like the attention.
I agree, who cares if they are fake. So long as she lets you play

i do more then playing if u know what I mean.....ask OH he saw the picture.

[A7X]

About entrapment... they can ask you if you want to buy some gear (especially if ur on a gear website or fourm like this.) They can't pressure you to buy it but they can give you an opperturity weather thur the mail or internet or in person. They can not however persent you with an unrealistic deal that would put pressure on you to make a purchuse. Ill get you the court ruling on entrapment... i just have to look thur my notes old ciminology notes real quick.

[A7X]

ok the court case is Jacobson V. U.S 1992. Its a case on entrapment where the police pressured him into buy child pron he was arrested and than the suprem court overruled saying setting the presendent on entrapment. (Its late and im getting tired so i dont know if that makes sense to anyone but jsut ask and ill try to explain it better if you need me to)

[OH REALLY]

ok the court case is Jacobson V. U.S 1992. Its a case on entrapment where the police pressured him into buy child pron he was arrested and than the suprem court overruled saying setting the presendent on entrapment. (Its late and im getting tired so i dont know if that makes sense to anyone but jsut ask and ill try to explain it better if you need me to)

sorry bud but we are talking about breast now so stop

[thegodfather]

ok the court case is Jacobson V. U.S 1992. Its a case on entrapment where the police pressured him into buy child pron he was arrested and than the suprem court overruled saying setting the presendent on entrapment. (Its late and im getting tired so i dont know if that makes sense to anyone but jsut ask and ill try to explain it better if you need me to)

It's a lot easier if you just post the holding of the case. That way you avoid possibly misinterpreting what the law actually is, in which case you would be giving poor legal advice if you were to do so. It's easier to let people draw their own conclusions about whether or not their behavior is legal and whether they may be being entrapped or not. That way, you CYA, and your conscience can stay clear.

Jacobson v. US 503 U.S. 540 (1992) Held: The prosecution failed, as a matter of law, to adduce evidence to support the jury verdict that Jacobson was predisposed, independent of the Government's acts and beyond a reasonable doubt, to violate the law by receiving child pornography through the mails. In their zeal to enforce the law, Government agents may not originate a criminal design, implant in an innocent person's mind the disposition to commit a criminal act, and then induce commission of the crime so that the Government may prosecute. Sorrells v. United States, 287 U. S. 435, 442. Jacobson was not simply offered the opportunity to order pornography, after which he promptly availed himself of that opportunity. He was the target of 26 months of repeated Government mailings and communications,and the Government has failed to carry its burden of proving predisposition independent of its attention.

[A7X]

thegodfather

My major is criminal justice and i was wondering if you could give me your opion on the part you put in bold. (im not to good with big words right now haha) reading that makes it sound like they cant even present an oppertunity for you to commit a crime...

[thegodfather]

thegodfather

My major is criminal justice and i was wondering if you could give me your opion on the part you put in bold. (im not to good with big words right now haha) reading that makes it sound like they cant even present an oppertunity for you to commit a crime...

It's not entirely clear to anyone, even lawyers. It literally varies on a case by case basis. That is because there is no real legislation or laws against entrapment, it exists entirely via case law. Many would say this is due to "activist judges." There are other such 'laws' or regulations and such, which are not spelled out in legislation or the Constitution, but which under certain circumstances can still be found to be unconstitutional or illegal. For instance, the SCOTUS finds a right to privacy in the "penumbra of rights" in the Constitution. They look at the Constitution's intended purpose, and find that the authors intentions through a collective analysis of all of the rights within it seem to advocate a right to privacy. But there is no enumerated clause which says "The people have a right to privacy."

If you are interested in the litmus test used in court for whether entrapment has occurred, look up the "Objective Test" and the "Subjective Test" with regard to entrapment. Those are the two different standards with which entrapment is examined in court. The objective test is the most desirable for the defense, and the subjective test is more desirable for prosecutors. It really comes to how the judge instructs the jury and such. But look it up and it will help you to understand it better.

[kinoplay1]

thanks for the info guys i did have a source when i wasnt juicing now i dont have a source i think im going take chance

[thegodfather]

thanks for the info guys i did have a source when i wasnt juicing now i dont have a source i think im going take chance

You're clearly fishing for a source on here...Stop.

[sarasotafloridabrian]

You're clearly fishing for a source on here...Stop.

Agreed. Tried with the smooth segway.

[kinoplay1]

dude i don't need to fish, if you read this i have a source and i had an awesome source, that i don't have now, if i was fishing i wouldn't be on the lounge, i would be on the forum group that didn't get off subject as a add kid off his ridlum

[DSM4Life]

Ill entrap you...

[kinoplay1]

i'm sure you could, i live in pa also, haha

[DSM4Life]

i'm sure you could, i live in pa also, haha

[kinoplay1]

that's funny, haha