short cycle vs long

[grapejuice11]

ive heard that people can get great gains from a 6 week on 6weeks off yearound cycle..they say its less effect on your body and will keep more of your gains...but also i hear longer 10 to 12 week cycles are better. so i was wondering if i can get your opinions on both, i have done 3 cycles and they were all 12 weeks long. any input would be great thank you.

[Bloodsaw]

6 weeks on, then you do 4 weeks of PCT, so your still going to be doing 10 weeks on 10 weeks off ....a 6 week cycle is going to be pretty uneffective unless your running Test prop. or something of the likes

[grapejuice11]

ya i was reading a article saying how using short ester at higher doses like this is effective

[barnyap]

its all personal, ive done 20 weeks, 16 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 weeks, and i have to say for value, the 6 week was alot more effective, almost same results with less gear, less shutdown, no nasty shit, but that aside, u cant run deca or eq for 6, a more effective cycle is prop/tren/orals. ill never be doing the 12-20 week cycles again, cost too much money and almost see no results after certain period

[grapejuice11]

can you tell me how you dosed this 6 week cycle?

[soldier01]

i run 6 week cycles all the time, and they are very effective.short esters..test p, mast p,
tren a, eq p all very effective at 6 weeks