Member
I know it's not ideal cuz prop is a fast acting ester, but I really enjoy running prop, I don't get any water from it, no sides, keeps my pretty dry as well.
I ran 12 weeks of it and gained 10-12 lbs, while dropping bf from 10-8%
So I'd really like to use it again, but want to incorporate more of a mass gaining cycle. What are your opinions on running d-bol for the first 4-5 weeks of a 12 week prop cycle?
Knowledgeable Member
I've heard alot of good things about prop, Why is it not ideal? If you don't mind pinning often I think it's the best. My next cycle will be sust. The one after that will most likely be prop.
Member
I meant it's not ideal to run dbol and prop, prop is a short ester test so it starts working a day or two after injection. Where as test e or test cyp are longer estered they take a few weeks to kick in.
Alot of people use Dbol to kick start gains when running a longer estered test so they don't have to wait 3 or 4 weeks to start seeing gains.
I just enjoyed the prop to much to use a different test, but I'd like to add an oral like dbol to really improve gains the first few weeks.
Retired~ AR-Hall of Famer ~ "Enforcer"
dbol/prop is fine if it matches your goals
'everything louder than everything else'
sounds ok, dbol gave me horrible back pumps though, pity, cos i love the strength off it
Knowledgeable Member
I like dbol so i ran it with my prop because i had to bulk this cycle using prop. It was a kickstart but i ran it as if it were one and i liked the gains. I have liked it so far but i prefer the long estered test
Senior Member
Dbol and prop is fine. As you mentioned prop is a fast acting ester so if I would incorparate dbol into my test cycle I would more than likely use testosterone e or cyp. But yeah its not a half bad cycle.
Member
Ok good to hear, how long should I run dbol 4-5 weeks?
Knowledgeable Member
4 weeks should be good
Member
Alright thanks, now I just gotta be patient and finish pct and have take about 12 weeks off :-(Originally Posted by Noles12
Member
I think I may have changed my mind. Reading over EQ's profile it seems safer for a newer user such as myself.
What are your guys thoughts on a prop/EQ cycle. I know it is not ideal for bulking, but I do have a solid diet regimen, and the prop had me eating like crazy.
THe profile of EQ said it resulted in slow but solid gains, so I thought running this along side prop could be a good cycle, what you guys think?
Knowledgeable Member
EQ is a waste of money imo
Member
how so?
Not disagreeing, just want opinions on it lol
"Even sexier than Siggy"
extremely weak, needs large doses, needs to be run for lengthy cycles, some say 14+ weeks... so many different compounds that work better with far less injecting
Member
Right I noticed it did have to be ran for a while at high doses. I just noticed the fact it was a rather mild anobolic.
I just worry about getting gyno, I didn't get any gyno from the prop, but reading dbol is notorious for gyno kinda scurred me a bit. Idk I have this fear of getting gyno, it freaks me out.
"Even sexier than Siggy"
switch to tbol, nnone of the water
Member
I saw tbol and it did intrigue me, but it said it may be hard to find any ugl's that make it.
i will have to check around to see if I can even find it.
Knowledgeable Member
I feel like ugl tbol is as easy to get as any other compound form a UGL...Many make it
Member
oh Ok, guess the profile was a bit deceiving, maybe it's a bit outdated.
Thanks for the comments guys, I appreciate it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote