Arnnie VS. Ronnie!

[Fat Guy]

This is a repost but it is awesomeand worth watching many times nonetheless!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aW20W...layer_embedded

[DSM4Life]

Ronnie had better drugs. I still like Arnolds overall look.

[Alphatier]

Ronnie, Yeeaaahhhh Buddy!!

[Skyler]

So Ronnie was 4 inches shorter, 50lb heavier, lower bodyfat on stage, more Olympia wins, and all his wins wer consecutive, and this debate still exists?

There is no hope for mankind.

[Alphatier]

^word

[SomeRandomGuy]

I think they both have a different body type to begin with. Look at Arnold's tiny waist. He was more lanky to begin with than Ronnie, who was short and compact. If judging is just about pure muscle size and not symmetry then Ronnie wins, otherwise Arnold looks better. Plus Arnold could actually run, and I doubt Ronnie could. He'd probably have a heart attack. I guess functionality isn't an issue in bodybuilding . But here's a thought, what if they had HGH and all the drugs they have now for Arnold to use? What would he have looked like?

[TopDogUK]

Its always hard to compare people from different times, Obviously now the supplements are better and we know more about the body and how it grows and how it reacts to things now etc but taking that into consideration and the way Arnie looked back then i would say he is the GOAT, Followed by Yates. Just my opinion...

[l2elapse]

arnie ftw

[bigboomer]

And yet arnie still looks better than ronnie even though ronnies freakishly bigger...Im a fan of pre hgh bodybuilders,absolurly disgusting what it does to these guys stomachs..

[warchild]

gh vs non gh

[Knockout_Power]

Arnie didnt sit 60+lbs over comp weight, Arnie had defined muscle groups, not just giant globs of muscle... Arnold was the Terminator... this is all

[big_ron]

I like arnies look, but if bodybuilding is based on muscle mass and bf % and symmetry i think ronnie takes the cake