Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Shooting GH intramuscular VS Sub Q?

  1. #1

    Shooting GH intramuscular VS Sub Q?

    Which is better with your experience? Does anyone notice local fat burning if shooting subq in the stomach area?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Back from Afghanistan
    Posts
    27,376
    GH burns where you pin it

    SubQ is the standard practice

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    20,517
    Here's what I think I know..... lol

    Most common protocol is sub Q as TR has stated..... The absorbtion rate is slower than IM but also higher. I can't remember where I read it but when you shoot IM the GH will get into the blood stream quicker but you'll absorb less of it.

    Whether I have that right or not..... theres not much of a reason to go IM. No need for added scar tissue.....

    ~Haz~

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •