Testosterone and ester's

[PK-V]

Now im probably goanna get flamed for this

A few months ago I was the guy saying that those buying test blends such as sus 250 were morons for wasting extra cash as test is just test once you get blood levels stable.

Now what if this is not simply the case?

Ok so the science is clear cut that the ester just controls the release rate of the testosterone into the surrounding tissue for absorption into the blood stream.

More and more people are saying that they are getting better gains from a test blend that they ever did off the long ester lengths ena/cyp/undec

Of course there is no studies and we have no idea if it's placebo and if diet/training etc was the same.. Maybe it was just the fact that it kicked in faster and they assumed it was better.

Is there more to it than just the time release?
Do people respond differently to different esters, variation of the esters to keep the receptors firing fact or fiction?

Then you have the slingshot theory which might apply to the different release times of the test blends. And guys saying "testosterone cypionate is a very raw drug that cypionate is more popular than enanthate, but the enanthate is terrific and cyp is crap. They draw conclusions without really understanding basic pharmacology."


Thoughts?

[Lemonada8]

people get better results because sust is replacement test supposed to be 1x a month or so, and people inject EOD or E3D etc. so bascially the test compounds up so instead of doing 250mg of test, when continued it adds up so by the end of the cycle its WAY higher than what you initially think.

I love short esters (prop) its fast acting and IMO better.

[magic32]

A very good read:

http://www. i s t e r o i d s . com/steroid-esters/