Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: Highest quality steroid hands down?? regardless of price

  1. #1

    Highest quality steroid hands down?? regardless of price

    Im 29 years old, 6 ft 180 lbs. Never took a steroid or HGH. Play tons of sports but notice lately getting more tired. Also, I partially tore my inner bicep golfing. I plan on taking HGH and/or a steroid for sure and am trying to figure out which of them regardless of price is the best on the market HANDS DOWN. Also, how hard to get. I have this keFei with a blue top and in a box of 15. Just looks a little sketchy bc it has no serial numbers etc. Any input would be great!! Heard anavar is the best?
    LMK!!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    N.Y
    Posts
    111
    mm mm mmmmmmm!!!! cover your head buddy!!! lol its about to rain!!!!!!! not allowed to talk about this. read the rules

  3. #3
    Really, didnt ask for prices. just trying to find out quality wise, the best.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    N.Y
    Posts
    111
    someone would have to give gear names and labs to answer your questions.

  5. #5
    dec11's Avatar
    dec11 is offline 'everything louder than everything else'
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    *no sources i wont reply*
    Posts
    14,140
    Quote Originally Posted by gjames2012 View Post
    someone would have to give gear names and labs to answer your questions.
    no they wouldnt, hes asking what ppl think are best quality compounds

  6. #6
    dec11's Avatar
    dec11 is offline 'everything louder than everything else'
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    *no sources i wont reply*
    Posts
    14,140
    OP, research through the compound section on what diff types do and how good they are for specific purposes and then come back with questions.

    hgh will def help with recovery and energy although you might be a tad on the young side for it meaning you'd need a higher dose

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    No source checks
    Posts
    31,195
    Being 6ft and 180lbs i would say your best bet would be large amounts of healthy food...
    Do not ask me for a source check.






  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    259
    Quote Originally Posted by Matt View Post
    Being 6ft and 180lbs i would say your best bet would be large amounts of healthy food...
    Not always.. depends how much bf he has. If he's naturally skinny and has low bf then at just under 13st he could be perfect for a first cycle.

    All speculation though..

  9. #9
    I don't think there is a "best". The gear we have available in 2011 is much more than in 1960. But if you had to choose, just ONE compound, now or later... TEST IS KING.

  10. #10
    Theres all different kinds of Test, Which brand/type is most reputable? Also with the LEASt side effects

  11. #11
    trenbolone..........stacked with test of course


    anavar for oral only

    anavar has nothing on test/tren

    you did ask ,best steroids ,hgh is not a steroid so cant add that ,same for slin and some peptides


    diet and training has a huge bfactor to play too

  12. #12
    Its not about which is the best, its about learning what the compound does and deciding if thats what your goal is.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    SEC
    Posts
    406
    the test with the least amount of sides is prop

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    13,685
    You need to see a Doc.And do wat he says to do 1st.This self medicate thing you got going on can back fire.And 6ft 180 is to light.Hell I was 5,9 190 nat.Small frame.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    285
    I agree with dog, make sure there is nothing else going on before you jump on AAS. If ur doc gives you a complete clean bill of health, then consider AAS. However your stats seem light, and if you are not eating enough now, AAS will not do much for you with the same diet. The hardest thing for me while cycling is eating enough. Seriously it a part time job!

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    1,799
    Quote Originally Posted by guitario View Post
    Not always.. depends how much bf he has. If he's naturally skinny and has low bf then at just under 13st he could be perfect for a first cycle.

    All speculation though..
    Ah, the wisdom of the 96 post man! Whats speculation? That food makes you grow? Lmao.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    259
    Quote Originally Posted by yungone501 View Post
    Ah, the wisdom of the 96 post man! Whats speculation? That food makes you grow? Lmao.
    I'm sorry, i bow down to your internet usage. I wish i could spend as much time online! ;-)

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    1,799
    Quote Originally Posted by guitario View Post
    I'm sorry, i bow down to your internet usage. I wish i could spend as much time online! ;-)
    It takes many hours of growth to get to where i am young grasshoppa.

    But seriously, rethink your statement.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    259
    Quote Originally Posted by yungone501 View Post
    It takes many hours of growth to get to where i am young grasshoppa.

    But seriously, rethink your statement.
    You basically agree with the idea that everyone has the same genetic potential and that height is relative. It isn't. I merely suggested that this guy may be reaching his genetic potential with regards to size. I don't know if he has or hasn't. He may have 20% bf or her may have 10%. All i wanted to point out is that nobody here knows so we shouldn't just give the 'eat more' response.

    After 13 years training and gaining 40lbs of muscle all i know is that 4000 cals a day (250g protein) doesn't do it for me anymore. I am just using my experience to give a suggestion..

    Also post count is not indicative of knowledge.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    1,799
    Wrong, post count has everything to do with overall wisdom and knowledge!

    Secondly, i would not call 6' @ 180 anybodys genetic potential. That is extremely skinny fod his height in terms of bodybuilding. Like most, everyone think just because they havent gained weight at an acceptable rate of time, that this will justify use of gear. In ur case it may be different: 4000cals with no growth is pretty self explanatory. This guy obviously has much more room for growth. He is in no way ready for gear at this height to weight ratio.

    Example: OP, give a days diet that you might typically eat including macros.


    Ps- im now one post smarter thanks to this response...
    Last edited by yungone501; 08-18-2011 at 11:33 AM.

  21. #21

  22. #22
    How would running Anavar only be for a first time bulking cycle?

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    flying from the ashes
    Posts
    3,966
    Terrible idea. Start you own thread. To the OP, there are so many other avenues to try before considering aas. Just from your posts I can tell you have alot to learn. Post up your diet in diet section for review and then workout section to post up your training regime. Oh test is test, it is the same compound, the "different" tests refer to the ester attached. Different release times.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    105
    Quote Originally Posted by guitario View Post
    You basically agree with the idea that everyone has the same genetic potential and that height is relative. It isn't. I merely suggested that this guy may be reaching his genetic potential with regards to size. I don't know if he has or hasn't. He may have 20% bf or her may have 10%. All i wanted to point out is that nobody here knows so we shouldn't just give the 'eat more' response.

    After 13 years training and gaining 40lbs of muscle all i know is that 4000 cals a day (250g protein) doesn't do it for me anymore. I am just using my experience to give a suggestion..

    Also post count is not indicative of knowledge.
    Thank you. I'm so tired of reading posts by people who think they understand somebody's genetic potential simply by reading their height and weight. It's the mantra here but it's ridiculous.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    1,799
    *******
    Last edited by yungone501; 08-18-2011 at 12:46 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •