So... Crappy news on Lance Armstrong officially losing his title from 1999 to 2005 for the Tour winner.
The news put out that the title will not be passed down because of the top 5 finishers over that 7 year period only 2 (of 35) cannot be "Linked" to Doping. IMO, that's just "linking" & doesn't mean they should rule anyone out. Now there's a "vacant" section & no winner.
Sounds to me like the playing field was pretty equal all the way around the top for years. The Anti Doping Agency is really pushing hard for examples & nothing has been said for the others involved? Why is Lance the only example or are they nailing everyone?
I think his title should have remained. Imagine hitting up past bodybuilders........ This sucks, Lance was a killer athlete doping or not, he wanted it bad & took it! Curious how involved this cover-up is?


Reply With Quote
