I have been doing it sub Q but have heard Im is better..? Does it matter? Better results?
I have been doing it sub Q but have heard Im is better..? Does it matter? Better results?
you guys started a trend with all these sub-q pins.
Doesn't matter.
Lots of info on this in the HRT forum. In fact, i think there's a sticky on this.
Some would argue hormone stability is a bit better SubQ.
I only do it cause I was pinning gear everywear else so it was a nice break to the muscles... I'm only asking for results reasons.. does it enter your body better through the muscle..
I can only believe that absortion rate is the same no matter which method uses. Volume is the issue when dealing with SubQ. I plan to stick to IM myself. I worry about getting sub pockets of juice!
Nevermind...just noticed we the title was HCG....def SubQ.
So lunk. Ppl are pinning gear subQ?? Ya I'm not too sure I'd go that route either.. b12 is all good but idk bout gear.
I prefer IM (but I pin EOD so stability is less on an issue)
I do IM based on this study
http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/con...8/11/2294.full
Subq is easier imho. But really it doesnt matter. You can do either.
I have always pinned HCG SubQ. Got that advice from here some time ago. Easy peasy, less IM holes...Lol.
For you guys pinning sub-Q to avoid beating up your muscles or whatever...ITS A SLIN PIN!! It isn't damaging your muscles (and unless you're using an 18g, it is the hormone crystalizing in depot or otherwise irritating the muscle that causes scar tissue buildup, not the needle itself).
I usually can't even feel it going in, and it is more of a hassle to pinch the skin and try to go in at an angle than to just punch it into my delt and inject.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)