is EQ alot safer than deca ?

[hobnob]

when used at 600mg is eq far safer and less harsh on the bodys HPTA system compared to deca ?

[Lunk1]

Apples to oranges... You would most likely never run them at the same doses to have a effect. Is EQ mild yes...it's also quite ineffectice for most!

[BuildBigger86]

EQ is much milder like " Lunk1" stated but it is definitely safer then Deca. When doing a cycle of EQ i suggest taking with test to see good gains.
When i run this cycle it goes as follows:
2 bottles eq 300 and 1 bottle test 300.
600-800mg eq for first 2 weeks, 400 mg eq for 8-10 weeks... 300 mg test eth for 10 weeks... Of course use Nolv and clomid for Pct

[jpowell]

EQ is much milder like " Lunk1" stated but it is definitely safer then Deca. When doing a cycle of EQ i suggest taking with test to see good gains.
When i run this cycle it goes as follows:
2 bottles eq 300 and 1 bottle test 300.
600-800mg eq for first 2 weeks, 400 mg eq for 8-10 weeks... 300 mg test eth for 10 weeks... Of course use Nolv and clomid for Pct

why are you tapering and then damn near cutting eq in half? (this is not frontloading if thas what you thought)
and i gaureentee you didn't notice again gains from eq at 10 weeks.
and one vail of 10ml of 300mg of test for a 10 week cycle--is really cutting it close. those gains had to minimal as well at 10 weeks.

most people only use at the upwards level of 600 b/c thas when they notice results. but however there are always exceptions--some report gains at 300-400mg wk.

[--->>405<<---]

:

hey Job is there somewhere u can look and see what each steroid was originally intended for when it was created??

[jpowell]

:

hey Job is there somewhere u can look and see what each steroid was originally intended for when it was created??

look who made his way out of the nutrition section...

[--->>405<<---]

look who made his way out of the nutrition section...

thx for noticing buddy!

[MickeyKnox]

:

hey Job is there somewhere u can look and see what each steroid was originally intended for when it was created??

Wikipedia will often give the history of a particular steroid.

And I agree with the EQ comments about dosing protocols. Im currently running 750mg/wk EQ (and a TRT dose of test 125mg e5d) and i haven't noticed anything staggering. But my muscles are fuller and im a bit stronger. So far at 5wks in i have noticed a change in body composition and vascular improvements without the increased BP..

[Metalject]

:

hey Job is there somewhere u can look and see what each steroid was originally intended for when it was created??

Boldenone (EQ) was originally created to treat wasting and osteoporosis. It was used medicinally for this purpose in humans for about 15yrs or so through the 60's and 70's and then became strictly a veterinarian steroid.

Nandrolone (Deca) was originally used for numerous things from lean mass promotion, treating anemia, osteoporosis, breast cancer, ulcers, pituitary deficient dwarfism, as well as development retardation in children and so on.

[The Bear 79]

Comparing Deca. to Equipose. is like comparing a bicycle to a Ferrari, they both have wheels, but only one actually has power & goes fast no matter who uses it.

[MickeyKnox]

Comparing Deca. to Equipose. is like comparing a bicycle to a Ferrari, they both have wheels, but only one actually has power & goes fast no matter who uses it.

Have i mentioned how much i missed you? lol

[John Andrew]

I will not waste time or money on EQ! Regards john

[AlphaMaleDawg]

safer? No, they each impact your body in different ways. EQ increases RBC and hematocrit, both things you need to monitor closely to avoid blood clots

[Metalject]

safer? No, they each impact your body in different ways. EQ increases RBC and hematocrit, both things you need to monitor closely to avoid blood clots

And so does Deca/Nandrolone, and significantly so, that's why it's used to treat anemia.

[ironbeck]

the only reason I'm not a fan of deca is bloating, besides this I think it's far superior to eq.