I was looking at the workout of Lazar Angelov and I was suprised of how many exercise He was doing...
6 exercise per muscle 2/3 muscle per day (3 exercise for abs)
His training look like 2 hours long...
Exemple:
His chest workout: (do not include the abs part...)
Flat Bench: 4 Sets × 8 Reps
Incline Bench: 4 Sets × 8
Decline Bench: 4 Sets × 8
Pullovers: 4 Sets × 12
Hammer Press: 3 Sets × 12
Dips: 3 Sets × 12
I personally do not have that much time...
My workout normally is splitted like this:
Monday: Chest-Upper back
Tuesday: Quad-hamstring-glute
Wednesday: Shoulder-lat
Thursday: rotator cuff-Calves-abs
Friday: Biceps-triceps
Week-ends: Rest or cardio (depending on my goal)
That kind of training works well for me so I stick with it.
Normally I do 4 exercise 3x(8-15) per muscle or 3 exercise 4x(8-15) depending on how I feel.
45minutes to 1hours training almost never more. Super-set mostly.
I want to bulk-up and sculp the shape of my muscle as much as I can.
I wanted to have your opinion on:
2 hours long training, is it really better??? As far as I know too long create too much stress on the body and overtraining at that amount of time is a serious concern...
On cycle: will 2 hours will be noticeably better than 1 hours. (Naturally, I can't keep up intensity past 1 hours...)
Lazar angelov is all about muscular definition. Do it really need that much exercise... Or we simply can change our training every 2 month to define what we want to define?
What you think about it??
Thanks
Completely aside: I've read that lot of guys were training their add/abd... is it important to add it in my training??
in term of exterior propriety I don't see any point to do that, and in term of functionality it will just adapt to the rest... I may be wrong...
Reply With Quote